Céline Clavel

35 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Céline Clavel
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Human-Computer Interaction 58
  • Applied Psychology 22
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
  • Social Psychology 79
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 62
Replace Alwin de Rooij with:
Alwin de Rooij Netherlands
H.C. van Vugt Netherlands
Kilian Semmelmann Germany
Kavous Salehzadeh Niksirat Switzerland
Özge Nilay Yalçın Canada
Mohammad Rafayet Ali United States
Denise Y. Geiskkovitch Canada
Petar Jerčić Sweden
Katrin Schoenenberg Germany
David Beyea United States
Céline Clavel relative to Alwin de Rooij Netherlands Alwin de Rooij's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Alwin de Rooij · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Céline Clavel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Céline Clavel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Céline Clavel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Céline Clavel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Céline Clavel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Céline Clavel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Céline Clavel. The network helps show where Céline Clavel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Céline Clavel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Céline Clavel Line = papers co-authored together Céline Clavel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201323
2 202022
3 201321
4 201821
5 202121
6 202016
7 201015
8 201513
9 20119
10 20168
11 20098
12 20147
13 20107
14 20187
15 20246
16 20225
17 20115
18
Matching artificial agents' and users' personalities: designing agents with regulatory-focus and testing the regulatory fit effect.
20153
19 20233
20 20173

About Céline Clavel

Céline Clavel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and Applied Psychology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 247 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (6 papers), Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (3 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations), Applied Psychology (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations), Social Psychology (79 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (62 citations). Céline Clavel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Japan and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Claude Martin, Nicolas Sabouret, Matthieu Courgeon, Patrick Bourdot, Weiya Chen, Stéphanie Buisine, Ouriel Grynszpan, Daniel Mestre, Steve Whittaker and Nicolas Férey. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Personality and Individual Differences, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and PRESENCE Virtual and Augmented Reality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact