Deborah Goodman‐Gruen

2.6k citations
23 papers · 2.1k indexed · h-index 21

Deborah Goodman‐Gruen

23 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Deborah Goodman‐Gruen
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 962
  • Physiology 490
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 368
  • Genetics 358
  • Molecular Biology 302
Replace Luigi Di Luigi with:
Luigi Di Luigi Italy
Anthony Morrison United States
Ping Patrick United States
Emanuela A. Greco Italy
Kerry L. Hildreth United States
Pier Paolo Vescovi Italy
Horace M. Perry United States
Edoardo Guastamacchia Italy
Frederick T. Murray United States
Takahisa Ushiroyama Japan
Deborah Goodman‐Gruen relative to Luigi Di Luigi Italy Luigi Di Luigi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Luigi Di Luigi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Goodman‐Gruen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Goodman‐Gruen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Goodman‐Gruen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Goodman‐Gruen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Goodman‐Gruen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Goodman‐Gruen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Goodman‐Gruen. The network helps show where Deborah Goodman‐Gruen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Goodman‐Gruen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Goodman‐Gruen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Goodman‐Gruen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Goodman‐Gruen. Deborah Goodman‐Gruen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 102
2 5
3 238
4 52
5 3
6 47
7 75
8 22
9 185
10 64
11 25
12 170
13 107
14 275
15 44
16 43
17 49
18 132
19
Total but not bioavailable testosterone is a predictor of central adiposity in postmenopausal women.
22
20 98

About Deborah Goodman‐Gruen

Deborah Goodman‐Gruen is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (8 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (5 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (962 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (161 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (257 citations). Deborah Goodman‐Gruen has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Barrett‐Connor, Donna Kritz‐Silverstein, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Deborah L. Wingard, Edward Castillo, Deborah J. Morton, Joanne H. E. Promislow, E. Barrett-Connor, Donald J. Slymen and Kathryn Hollenbach. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Diabetes Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026