Deborah E. Crawford
- Materials Chemistry top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry top 1%
- Inorganic Chemistry top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Stuart L. JamesJosé CasabánTony McNallyNicola GiriEvelina ColacinoJosé G. HernándezGavin WalkerCarsten Bolm
- Topics
- Crystallography and molecular interactions (10 papers)Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (8 papers)Crystallization and Solubility Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFranceGermany
In The Last Decade
Deborah E. Crawford
33 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Materials Chemistry 799
- Organic Chemistry 724
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 555
- Inorganic Chemistry 494
- Molecular Biology 416
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah E. Crawford
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah E. Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah E. Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah E. Crawford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah E. Crawford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah E. Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah E. Crawford. The network helps show where Deborah E. Crawford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah E. Crawford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah E. Crawford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah E. Crawford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah E. Crawford. Deborah E. Crawford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 118 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 98 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 71 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 100 | |
| 18 | 66 | |
| 19 | 57 | |
| 20 | 376 |
About Deborah E. Crawford
Deborah E. Crawford is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Catalysis and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallography and molecular interactions (10 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (8 papers) and Crystallization and Solubility Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (555 citations), Catalysis (282 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (494 citations). Deborah E. Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Stuart L. James, José Casabán, Tony McNally, Nicola Giri, Evelina Colacino, José G. Hernández, Gavin Walker, Carsten Bolm, Ahmad B. Albadarin and Qun Cao. Their work appears in journals such as Advanced Materials, Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Chemical Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.