Deborah Dawson

4.0k citations
46 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Dawson

44 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Deborah Dawson
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 255
  • Research and Theory 35
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 637
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 98
  • Surgery 832
Replace Nancy A. Pike with:
Nancy A. Pike United States
Alberto Noto Italy
Jean Guglielminotti United States
Maria Vargas Italy
Matt M. Kurrek Canada
W. Bosseau Murray United States
Stephen Asha Australia
Troy E. Dominguez United States
Andrew Hilton Australia
Christoph Eich Germany
Deborah Dawson relative to Nancy A. Pike United States Nancy A. Pike's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.3×
Nancy A. Pike · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Dawson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Dawson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Dawson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Dawson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Dawson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Dawson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Dawson. The network helps show where Deborah Dawson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Dawson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Dawson Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Dawson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202116
2 201434
3 201269
4 201218
5 20122
6
Efficacy of functional hemodynamic parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness with pulse power analysis in surgical patients.
201233
7 201111
8 200912
9 200869
10 20089
11 200731
12 200556
13 200513
14 200516
15 200547
16 2005475
17 2005146
18 200520
19 19747
20 195715

About Deborah Dawson

Deborah Dawson is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Research and Theory, Internal Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (11 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (11 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (9 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (4 papers) and Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (255 citations), Research and Theory (35 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (637 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (98 citations) and Surgery (832 citations). Deborah Dawson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Rhodes, RM Grounds, Jayne Fawcett, Rupert M. Pearse, Ed Bennett, Catherine M Jones, Maurizio Cecconi, Sarah Farnell, Gillian Colville and Linda Perkins-Porras. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care, Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Nursing in Critical Care, British Journal of Haematology and Applied Acoustics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026