Deborah Cox

1.3k total citations
41 papers, 785 citations indexed

About

Deborah Cox is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Economics and Econometrics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Cox has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 785 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Deborah Cox's work include Regional Development and Policy (5 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers). Deborah Cox is often cited by papers focused on Regional Development and Policy (5 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (4 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (2 papers). Deborah Cox collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Deborah Cox's co-authors include David Ellis, Katherine Hall, Katharine Barker, Rebecca Boden, Stefan de Jong, Peter van den Besselaar, Philip Gummett, John Rigby, Dimitri Gagliardi and María Nedeva and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientometrics, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal and R and D Management.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Cox

37 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Deborah Cox United Kingdom	13	265	118	108	95	88	41	785
Björn Hammarfelt Sweden	17	211 0.8×	169 1.4×	167 1.5×	83 0.9×	59 0.7×	47	1.2k
Antonio Díaz Andrade New Zealand	13	135 0.5×	244 2.1×	47 0.4×	42 0.4×	37 0.4×	34	646
Bruce R. Kingma United States	12	126 0.5×	333 2.8×	37 0.3×	75 0.8×	202 2.3×	26	784
John P. Walsh United States	16	156 0.6×	182 1.5×	200 1.9×	180 1.9×	234 2.7×	37	1.3k
Franci Pivec Slovenia	6	99 0.4×	87 0.7×	64 0.6×	86 0.9×	126 1.4×	18	571
Alesia Zuccala Denmark	18	344 1.3×	114 1.0×	107 1.0×	43 0.5×	32 0.4×	43	993
Michael Gurstein Canada	10	210 0.8×	227 1.9×	60 0.6×	41 0.4×	21 0.2×	47	834
Ricardo Gómez United States	17	314 1.2×	305 2.6×	54 0.5×	34 0.4×	35 0.4×	96	951
Ronald R. Powell United States	15	409 1.5×	145 1.2×	67 0.6×	61 0.6×	26 0.3×	41	1.1k
Ana Cristina Vasconcelos United Kingdom	14	99 0.4×	300 2.5×	48 0.4×	94 1.0×	58 0.7×	28	811

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Cox

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Cox

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Cox. The network helps show where Deborah Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Cox

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Cox. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Cox based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Cox. Deborah Cox is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Rigby, John, et al.. (2018). Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. Scientometrics. 114(3). 1087–1105. 33 indexed citations

Yeow, Jillian, John Rigby, Stephen Roper, et al.. (2017). A Review of the Small Business Research Initiative. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 1 indexed citations

Gagliardi, Dimitri, et al.. (2015). Annual Report on European SMEs 2014 / 2015:SMEs start hiring again. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 30 indexed citations

Gagliardi, Dimitri, et al.. (2015). Annual Report on European SMEs 2014 / 2015 SMEs start hiring again SME PERFORMANCE REVIEW 2014/2015. Research Padua Archive (University of Padua). 15 indexed citations

Green, Lawrence, et al.. (2015). Designs for life: new stakeholders and new spaces in the evolving services landscape. foresight. 17(4). 1 indexed citations

Jong, Stefan de, et al.. (2014). Understanding societal impact through productive interactions: ICT research as a case. Research Evaluation. 23(2). 89–102. 100 indexed citations

Miles, Ian, John Rigby, & Deborah Cox. (2012). Demand-Led Innovation. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 6–33. 3 indexed citations

Cox, Deborah, et al.. (2011). Final report on social impacts of research. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 3 indexed citations

Cox, Deborah, Arnold Verbeek, Aris Kaloudis, et al.. (2008). Evidence on the main factors inhibiting mobility and career development of researchers. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 16 indexed citations

10.

Howells, Jeremy, Bruce Tether, Deborah Cox, & John Rigby. (2006). Information technology research in the UK: perspectives on services research and development, and systems of innovation. Science and Public Policy. 33(1). 17–31. 2 indexed citations

11.

Boden, Rebecca, Deborah Cox, & María Nedeva. (2006). The appliance of science? New public management and strategic change. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. 18(2). 125–141. 18 indexed citations

12.

Bee, Penny, John Baker, David Richards, et al.. (2005). Organizing and delivering training for acute mental health services: a discussion paper. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 12(2). 139–145. 11 indexed citations

13.

James, Andrew, Deborah Cox, & John Rigby. (2005). Testing the boundaries of public private partnership: the privatisation of the UK Defence Evaluation and Research Agency. Science and Public Policy. 32(2). 155–161. 7 indexed citations

14.

Cox, Deborah, et al.. (2004). WHO ME, ANGRY? PATTERNS OF ANGER DIVERSION IN WOMEN. Health Care For Women International. 25(9). 872–893. 26 indexed citations

15.

Cox, Deborah, et al.. (2004). WHAT'S THE USE IN GETTING MAD? ANGER AND INSTRUMENTALITY IN WOMEN'S RELATIONSHIPS. Health Care For Women International. 25(9). 813–834. 8 indexed citations

16.

Georghiou, Luke, et al.. (2003). A Comparative Analysis of Public, Semi-Public and Recently Privatised Research Centres, Summary Final Report. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 9 indexed citations

17.

Thompson, M., et al.. (2002). A methodology proposed for a South African national wetland inventory. 4 indexed citations

18.

Georghiou, Luke, Deborah Cox, Katharine Barker, Rebecca Boden, & Philip Gummett. (2001). Administrative Reform of United Kingdom Government Research Establishments: Case studies of new organisational forms. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 6 indexed citations

19.

Amodeo, Maryann, Susan Wilson, & Deborah Cox. (1995). Mounting a community-based alcohol and drug abuse prevention effort in a multicultural urban setting: Challenges and lessons learned. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 16(2). 165–185. 7 indexed citations

20.

Cox, Deborah, et al.. (1983). Archaeological Assessment Survey of the Pettaquamscutt River Basin. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact