Deborah Baker

680 citations
21 papers · 290 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Deborah Baker

18 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Deborah Baker
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Internal Medicine 69
  • Family Practice 21
  • Applied Psychology 24
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 5
  • Emergency Medical Services 16
Replace Sahil Sandhu with:
Sahil Sandhu United States
Azza AbuDagga United States
Rachel D. Havyer United States
Susan Lynch United States
Jessica C. Dudley United States
Sarah Davies United Kingdom
Remi Love United States
Carol Smith United States
Solveig M. Lundgren Sweden
Nancy Phifer United States
Deborah Baker relative to Sahil Sandhu United States Sahil Sandhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sahil Sandhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Baker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Baker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Baker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Baker. The network helps show where Deborah Baker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Baker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Baker Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Baker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200281
2 201156
3 200529
4 201727
5 200623
6 202217
7 200915
8 201612
9 19908
10 20216
11 20153
12 20193
13 20242
14 20232
15 20202
16 20251
17
The Association of Small Bombs by Karan Mahajan
20161
18 20201
19
13: Climate Action
20211
20 20240

About Deborah Baker

Deborah Baker is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Social Psychology and Physiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (69 citations), Family Practice (21 citations), Applied Psychology (24 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (5 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (16 citations). Deborah Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lynn F. Bufka, George C. Velmahos, Edward E. Cornwell, David C. Chang, Kurtis A. Campbell, Ralph H. Hruban, JoAnn Coleman, Sharon J. Olsen, Marie T. Nolan and Mary Hodgin. Their work appears in journals such as Professional Psychology Research and Practice, Cancer Nursing, Communication Quarterly, Nursing Outlook and Journal of Trauma Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact