Deborah Ansley

25 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

Deborah Ansley
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 179
  • Pharmacology 125
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 29
  • General Health Professions 81
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 93
Replace Elaine Stickrath with:
Elaine Stickrath United States
Jasna Twynstra Canada
Kimberly K. Trout United States
Eleni Spyreli United Kingdom
Suzanne Cuda United States
Wolfgang Gombas Austria
Nicholas J. Somerville United States
María Ángeles Gómez Spain
Elodie Zana‐Taïeb France
Romana Ortner Austria
Deborah Ansley relative to Elaine Stickrath United States Elaine Stickrath's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Elaine Stickrath · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Ansley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Ansley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Ansley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Ansley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Ansley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Ansley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Ansley. The network helps show where Deborah Ansley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Ansley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Ansley Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Ansley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202166
2 199929
3 202226
4 202222
5 202318
6 202012
7 202312
8 20248
9 20227
10 20246
11 20246
12 20234
13 20234
14 20244
15 20224
16 20222
17 20242
18 20222
19 20231
20 20251

About Deborah Ansley

Deborah Ansley is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Pharmacology and Epidemiology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 241 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (27 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (19 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (14 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (13 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (179 citations), Pharmacology (125 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (29 citations), General Health Professions (81 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (93 citations). Deborah Ansley has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kelly C. Young‐Wolff, Sara R. Adams, Stacey Alexeeff, Monique B. Does, Lyndsay A. Avalos, G. Thomas Ray, Nancy Goler, Amy Conway, Tara R. Foti and Thomas J. Garite. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA Network Open, Journal of Addiction Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Addiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact