Debora D. Wright

535 total citations
7 papers, 434 citations indexed

About

Debora D. Wright is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Debora D. Wright has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 434 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sensory Systems, 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Debora D. Wright's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). Debora D. Wright is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (6 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers). Debora D. Wright collaborates with scholars based in United States. Debora D. Wright's co-authors include David K. Ryugo, George A. Spirou, Paul B. Manis, Bradford J. May, Craig Blackstone, Richard L. Huganir, Alan H. Sharp, Tan Pongstaporn, Timothy H. Murphy and Jay M. Baraban and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Journal of Neurochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Debora D. Wright

7 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Debora D. Wright United States	7	363	242	166	131	45	7	434
Eileen S. Kane United States	12	347 1.0×	215 0.9×	109 0.7×	118 0.9×	46 1.0×	13	392
Colette Devigne France	13	304 0.8×	198 0.8×	138 0.8×	96 0.7×	75 1.7×	14	520
Thane E. Benson United States	13	582 1.6×	405 1.7×	176 1.1×	142 1.1×	107 2.4×	19	650
Kelly Paris Hunter United States	8	437 1.2×	345 1.4×	93 0.6×	112 0.9×	82 1.8×	8	515
Peggy Shadduck Palombi United States	11	524 1.4×	529 2.2×	138 0.8×	69 0.5×	49 1.1×	12	673
W. E. Brownell United States	6	410 1.1×	381 1.6×	106 0.6×	75 0.6×	37 0.8×	12	531
Andreas Aschoff Germany	10	292 0.8×	287 1.2×	222 1.3×	96 0.7×	41 0.9×	11	608
S. Zhang China	9	395 1.1×	297 1.2×	228 1.4×	78 0.6×	52 1.2×	14	608
Deborah C. Bishop United States	12	465 1.3×	459 1.9×	193 1.2×	85 0.6×	82 1.8×	18	683
Susanne Dehmel Germany	10	442 1.2×	429 1.8×	119 0.7×	153 1.2×	31 0.7×	12	563

Countries citing papers authored by Debora D. Wright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debora D. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debora D. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debora D. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debora D. Wright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debora D. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debora D. Wright. The network helps show where Debora D. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debora D. Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debora D. Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debora D. Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debora D. Wright. Debora D. Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Wright, Debora D., Craig Blackstone, Richard L. Huganir, & David K. Ryugo. (1996). Immunocytochemical localization of the mGluR1? metabotropic glutamate receptor in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 364(4). 729–745. 53 indexed citations

2.

Wright, Debora D. & David K. Ryugo. (1996). Mossy fiber projections from the cuneate nucleus to the cochlear nucleus in the rat. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 365(1). 159–172. 163 indexed citations

3.

Ryugo, David K., Tan Pongstaporn, Debora D. Wright, & Alan H. Sharp. (1995). Inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptors: Immunocytochemical localization in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 358(1). 102–118. 40 indexed citations

4.

Wright, Debora D., et al.. (1995). Neuronal organization of the cochlear nuclei in alligator lizards: A light and electron microscopic investigation. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 357(2). 217–241. 11 indexed citations

5.

Manis, Paul B., et al.. (1994). Physiology and morphology of complex spiking neurons in the guinea pig dorsal cochlear nucleus. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 348(2). 261–276. 101 indexed citations

6.

Spirou, George A., Bradford J. May, Debora D. Wright, & David K. Ryugo. (1993). Frequency organization of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in cats. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 329(1). 36–52. 55 indexed citations

7.

Murphy, Timothy H., Debora D. Wright, & Jay M. Baraban. (1992). Phosphoinositide Turnover Associated with Synaptic Transmission. Journal of Neurochemistry. 59(6). 2336–2339. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact