Deana Grobe

652 total citations
21 papers, 481 citations indexed

About

Deana Grobe is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Deana Grobe has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 481 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Gender Studies and 5 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Deana Grobe's work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers) and Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers). Deana Grobe is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers) and Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers). Deana Grobe collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deana Grobe's co-authors include Mary Cluskey, Robin A. Douthitt, Lydia Zepeda, Elizabeth E. Davis, Ellen K. Scott, Carolyn A. Raab, Melinda M. Manore, Clara C. Pratt, Michael T. Morrissey and Mark Edwards and has published in prestigious journals such as Risk Analysis, Children and Youth Services Review and Journal of Consumer Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Deana Grobe

20 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Deana Grobe United States	10	157	146	109	84	83	21	481
Claire Tanner Australia	14	126 0.8×	107 0.7×	109 1.0×	36 0.4×	93 1.1×	32	507
Debbie Kemmer United Kingdom	8	88 0.6×	328 2.2×	86 0.8×	47 0.6×	77 0.9×	12	563
Yara Qutteina Belgium	11	177 1.1×	152 1.0×	54 0.5×	49 0.6×	96 1.2×	19	426
Cynthia Gordon United States	14	137 0.9×	112 0.8×	112 1.0×	49 0.6×	73 0.9×	36	698
Lucy Zinkiewicz Australia	13	47 0.3×	184 1.3×	144 1.3×	37 0.4×	80 1.0×	36	640
Priya Fielding‐Singh United States	14	304 1.9×	97 0.7×	115 1.1×	22 0.3×	133 1.6×	26	682
Kathryn Morgan Canada	9	72 0.5×	95 0.7×	77 0.7×	32 0.4×	150 1.8×	35	492
Marie Marquis Canada	12	189 1.2×	97 0.7×	74 0.7×	29 0.3×	66 0.8×	38	466
Susan Bartlett United States	11	254 1.6×	200 1.4×	241 2.2×	199 2.4×	35 0.4×	16	746
Jennifer Brady United States	14	56 0.4×	171 1.2×	76 0.7×	36 0.4×	146 1.8×	48	529

Countries citing papers authored by Deana Grobe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deana Grobe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deana Grobe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deana Grobe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deana Grobe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deana Grobe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deana Grobe. The network helps show where Deana Grobe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deana Grobe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deana Grobe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deana Grobe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deana Grobe. Deana Grobe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2018). Predictors of low-income parent child care selections. Children and Youth Services Review. 88. 528–540. 21 indexed citations

Weber, Bruce A., et al.. (2018). Participation in USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): Effect of Local Labor Market Conditions in Oregon. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2016). Using Policy-Relevant Administrative Data in Mixed Methods: A Study of Employment Instability and Parents’ Use of Child Care Subsidies. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 38(1). 146–162. 13 indexed citations

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2014). Does policy matter? The effect of increasing child care subsidy policy generosity on program outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review. 44. 135–144. 23 indexed citations

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2014). Early Childhood Training and Certification Scholarship Program Evaluation.

Davis, Elizabeth E., et al.. (2012). Common Challenges in the Study of Continuity of Child Care Subsidy Participation. Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-55.. 2 indexed citations

Davis, Elizabeth E., et al.. (2010). Rural–Urban Differences in Childcare Subsidy Use and Employment Stability. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy. 32(1). 135–153. 11 indexed citations

Cluskey, Mary & Deana Grobe. (2009). College Weight Gain and Behavior Transitions: Male and Female Differences. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 109(2). 325–329. 188 indexed citations

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2007). Trading Off Fish Health and Safety: Female Decision‐Making Processes toward the Risk of Methylmercury in Fish. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 41(2). 250–264. 5 indexed citations

10.

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2007). Why Do They Leave? Child Care Subsidy Use in Oregon. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 29(1). 110–127. 39 indexed citations

11.

Grobe, Deana & Carolyn A. Raab. (2004). Voters’ Response to Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods: Oregon's Experience. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 38(2). 320–331. 5 indexed citations

12.

Raab, Carolyn A. & Deana Grobe. (2003). Labeling Genetically Engineered Food: The Consumer's Right to Know?. MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri). 6(4). 4 indexed citations

13.

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (2002). Designing a Culinology(r) Based Research and Development Framework for Seafood Products. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 11(2). 61–71. 2 indexed citations

14.

Pratt, Clara C., et al.. (2000). Oregon Extension Volunteers: Partners in Action.. TigerPrints (Clemson University). 38(2). 9 indexed citations

15.

Grobe, Deana, Robin A. Douthitt, & Lydia Zepeda. (1999). A model of consumers' risk perceptions toward recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH): the impact of risk characteristics.. Risk Analysis. 19(4). 661–673. 54 indexed citations

16.

Grobe, Deana, Robin A. Douthitt, & Lydia Zepeda. (1999). A Model of Consumers' Risk Perceptions Toward Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rbGH): The Impact of Risk Characteristics. Risk Analysis. 19(4). 661–673. 41 indexed citations

17.

Grobe, Deana, Robin A. Douthitt, & Lydia Zepeda. (1999). Consumer Risk Perception Profiles Regarding Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone (rbGH). Journal of Consumer Affairs. 33(2). 254–275. 19 indexed citations

18.

Grobe, Deana, et al.. (1997). Perception of Managerial Style as Definition of Self: A First Approach. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 25(3). 286–297. 1 indexed citations

19.

Douthitt, Robin A., Lydia Zepeda, & Deana Grobe. (1996). Comparison of National and Poor Households: Results of a Survey of Consumer Knowledge and Risk Perceptions of Food-Related Biotechnologies. 5 indexed citations

20.

Grobe, Deana & Robin A. Douthitt. (1995). Consumer Acceptance of Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone: Interplay Between Beliefs and Perceived Risks. Journal of Consumer Affairs. 29(1). 128–143. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact