Dean H. Gjerstad

1.7k total citations
58 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Dean H. Gjerstad is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Dean H. Gjerstad has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 38 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 31 papers in Plant Science and 20 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Dean H. Gjerstad's work include Forest ecology and management (22 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (18 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers). Dean H. Gjerstad is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (22 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (18 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers). Dean H. Gjerstad collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Dean H. Gjerstad's co-authors include Glenn R. Glover, Bruce R. Zutter, Robert J. Mitchell, David B. South, E. Barry Moser, Craig W. Hedman, Stephen D. Pecot, Rebecca Mitchell, James P. Barnett and Michael R. Kuhns and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, New Phytologist and Ecological Applications.

In The Last Decade

Dean H. Gjerstad

56 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dean H. Gjerstad United States 22 856 587 523 281 130 58 1.3k
C. Buschena United States 8 642 0.8× 486 0.8× 601 1.1× 133 0.5× 212 1.6× 9 1.1k
Thomas W. Jurik United States 23 606 0.7× 686 1.2× 920 1.8× 326 1.2× 98 0.8× 39 1.5k
D. N. Fife Australia 12 700 0.8× 461 0.8× 505 1.0× 149 0.5× 318 2.4× 17 1.1k
Bernard Prévosto France 20 704 0.8× 418 0.7× 330 0.6× 229 0.8× 119 0.9× 56 1.1k
M. F. Proe United Kingdom 17 542 0.6× 486 0.8× 480 0.9× 113 0.4× 258 2.0× 30 1.0k
K. S. Werk Germany 16 565 0.7× 386 0.7× 649 1.2× 168 0.6× 133 1.0× 19 1.1k
David B. South United States 20 1.2k 1.4× 334 0.6× 851 1.6× 105 0.4× 161 1.2× 151 1.5k
Dirk Vanderklein United States 12 820 1.0× 814 1.4× 700 1.3× 179 0.6× 170 1.3× 23 1.5k
Ralph S. Meldahl United States 18 493 0.6× 495 0.8× 219 0.4× 183 0.7× 60 0.5× 42 790
Thomas T. Lei Japan 19 530 0.6× 616 1.0× 738 1.4× 205 0.7× 69 0.5× 35 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Dean H. Gjerstad

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean H. Gjerstad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean H. Gjerstad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean H. Gjerstad more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean H. Gjerstad

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean H. Gjerstad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean H. Gjerstad. The network helps show where Dean H. Gjerstad may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dean H. Gjerstad

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dean H. Gjerstad. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dean H. Gjerstad based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dean H. Gjerstad. Dean H. Gjerstad is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Runion, G. Brett, Andrew J. Price, Stephen A. Prior, et al.. (2008). Effects of Elevated Atmospheric CO(2) on a C(3) and a C(4) Invasive Weed. 1(3). 56–62. 3 indexed citations
2.
Mitchell, Rebecca, Bruce R. Zutter, Dean H. Gjerstad, Glenn R. Glover, & C. W. Wood. (1999). COMPETITION AMONG SECONDARY-SUCCESSIONAL PINE COMMUNITIES: A FIELD STUDY OF EFFECTS AND RESPONSES. Ecology. 80(3). 857–872. 40 indexed citations
3.
Zutter, Bruce R., Robert J. Mitchell, Glenn R. Glover, & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1999). Root length and biomass in mixtures of broomsedge with loblolly pine or sweetgum. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 29(7). 926–933. 8 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, Rhett & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1998). Landscape-Scale Restoration of the Longleaf Pine Ecosystem. Ecological Restoration. 16(1). 41–45. 9 indexed citations
5.
Somers, Greg L., et al.. (1995). Yet All will be Foresters: Curriculum Reform at Auburn University. Journal of Forestry. 93(1). 20–24. 2 indexed citations
6.
Mitchell, Rebecca, et al.. (1994). Seasonal variation in competitive effect on water stress and pine responses. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 24(7). 1440–1449. 18 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, Rebecca, et al.. (1993). Spatial and Temporal Variation in Competitive Effects on Soil Moisture and Pine Response. Ecological Applications. 3(1). 167–174. 37 indexed citations
8.
Jordan, D. N., et al.. (1991). Response of total tannins and phenolics in loblolly pine foliage exposed to ozone and acid rain. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 17(3). 505–513. 41 indexed citations
9.
Kuhns, Michael R. & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1991). Distribution of 14C-labeled photosynthate in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seedlings as affected by season and time after exposure. Tree Physiology. 8(3). 259–271. 21 indexed citations
10.
Jain, Rahul, et al.. (1989). Improving productivity of multipurpose trees growing on substandard soils in India. Journal of Forestry. 87(4). 38–39. 26 indexed citations
11.
Gjerstad, Dean H.. (1989). Prevention of infestation by Dermestes maculatus Degeer in east African dried fish using pyrethrum and piperonyl butoxide. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 2 indexed citations
12.
Glover, Glenn R., et al.. (1989). Herbaceous Weed Control Increases Loblolly Pine Growth. Journal of Forestry. 87(2). 47–50. 27 indexed citations
13.
Zutter, Bruce R., et al.. (1988). Response Following Aerial Applications of Glyphosate for Release of Loblolly Pine in the Virginia Piedmont. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 12(1). 54–58. 5 indexed citations
14.
Zutter, Bruce R., Dean H. Gjerstad, & Glenn R. Glover. (1987). Fusiform Rust Incidence and Severity in Loblolly Pine Plantations Following Herbaceous Weed Control. Forest Science. 33(3). 790–800. 1 indexed citations
15.
Zutter, Bruce R., Glenn R. Glover, & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1986). Effects of Herbaceous Weed Control Using Herbicides on a Young Loblolly Pine Plantation. Forest Science. 32(4). 882–899. 54 indexed citations
16.
Gjerstad, Dean H., et al.. (1986). Determining nitrogen status of young loblolly pine by leaf reflectance. Tree Physiology. 1(3). 333–339. 17 indexed citations
17.
Sung, Shi‐Jean S., David B. South, & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1985). Bioassay Indicates a Metabolite of Hexazinone Affects Photosynthesis of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taeda). Weed Science. 33(4). 440–442. 13 indexed citations
18.
Nelson, Larry R., Bruce R. Zutter, & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1985). Planted Longleaf Pine Seedlings Respond to Herbaceous Weed Control Using Herbicides. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 9(4). 236–240. 26 indexed citations
19.
Sung, Shi‐Jean S., et al.. (1981). Hexazinone Persistence in Two Different Types of Soils. 4 indexed citations
20.
South, David B. & Dean H. Gjerstad. (1980). Nursery Weed Control with Herbicides or Fumigation—An Economic Evaluation. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 4(1). 40–45. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026