David Wiles

1.7k citations
42 papers · 400 indexed · h-index 11

David Wiles

30 papers receiving 239 citations

Peers

David Wiles
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 101
  • Music 42
  • Anthropology 103
  • Literature and Literary Theory 117
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 8
Replace W. B. Yeats with:
W. B. Yeats United States
Denis Hollier
Jonathan Crewe United States
bill brown United States
Bernard F. Dick United States
Henry Sussman United States
Edith Hall United Kingdom
Éric Csapo Australia
Catherine Belsey United Kingdom
Jonas A. Barish United States
David Wiles relative to W. B. Yeats United States W. B. Yeats's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
W. B. Yeats · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wiles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wiles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wiles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wiles. The network helps show where David Wiles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Wiles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wiles Line = papers co-authored together David Wiles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202019
2 20146
3
Theatre and Time
20141
4 20126
5 20081
6
Mask and Performance in Greek Tragedy: From Ancient Festival to Modern Experimentation
200725
7 200334
8 20001
9 19992
10 19961
11
Some Australian Observations on Human Service History.
19960
12
Human services: Australian explorations
19941
13 19932
14 19930
15
Aged Australians and social policy pension attitudes across eight decades
19891
16 198845
17 19880
18 19871
19 19871
20 19859

About David Wiles

David Wiles is a scholar working on Anthropology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Music and Archeology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (13 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (6 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Philippine History and Culture (4 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (3 papers), Contemporary and Historical Greek Studies (3 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (101 citations), Music (42 citations), Anthropology (103 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (117 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (8 citations). David Wiles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Thomas J. King, Éric Csapo, Sander M. Goldberg, Graham Ley, John Walton, Fritz Graf, Mark Griffith, Jon Hesk, Gonda Van Steen and Marianne McDonald. Their work appears in journals such as New Theatre Quarterly, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, The Modern Language Review, The Classical World and Greece and Rome.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026