David W. Deaton

53 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

David W. Deaton
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Developmental Neuroscience 190
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 705
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 753
  • Emergency Medicine 282
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 133
Replace Joseph E. Flack with:
Joseph E. Flack United States
John A. Rousou United States
Neel R. Sodha United States
Pyng Jing Lin Taiwan
Yong Seon Choi South Korea
Jacob Raphael United States
Rolf Ekroth Sweden
G. Matheis Germany
Edward O. McFalls United States
Matthias Behrends United States
David W. Deaton relative to Joseph E. Flack United States Joseph E. Flack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joseph E. Flack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Deaton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Deaton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Deaton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Deaton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Deaton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Deaton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Deaton. The network helps show where David W. Deaton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David W. Deaton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David W. Deaton Line = papers co-authored together David W. Deaton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20201
2 201848
3 20103
4 20075
5 200412
6 200311
7 200051
8 200018
9 1999182
10 199951
11 19994
12 199624
13 19961
14 19962
15 199520
16 199510
17 1994263
18 199317
19 199217
20 19915

About David W. Deaton

David W. Deaton is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Surgery, having authored 54 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (26 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (13 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (10 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (190 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (705 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (753 citations), Emergency Medicine (282 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (133 citations). David W. Deaton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joseph E. Flack, Richard M. Engelman, John A. Rousou, Dipak K. Das, Nilanjana Maulik, J. A. Rousou, Penelope S. Pekow, Daniel T. Engelman, Reni Kalfin and Philip D. Allmendinger. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Circulation, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026