David von Oheimb
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Co-authors
- Tobias NipkowRadha PoovendranRichard RobinsonKrishna SampigethayaMingyan LiOscar SlotoschOlaf Müller
- Topics
- Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers)Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Functional ProgrammingConcurrency and Computation Practice and ExperienceInternational Journal of Information Security
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
David von Oheimb
7 papers receiving 371 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
- Artificial Intelligence 245
- Computer Networks and Communications 223
- Information Systems 185
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 90
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 60
Countries citing papers authored by David von Oheimb
This map shows the geographic impact of David von Oheimb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David von Oheimb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David von Oheimb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David von Oheimb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David von Oheimb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David von Oheimb. The network helps show where David von Oheimb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David von Oheimb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David von Oheimb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David von Oheimb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David von Oheimb. David von Oheimb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | The High-Level Protocol Specification Language HLPSL developed in the EU project AVISPA | 193 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 41 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 85 |
About David von Oheimb
David von Oheimb is a scholar working on Software, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 7 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers) and Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Networks and Communications (223 citations), Information Systems (185 citations) and Software (31 citations). David von Oheimb has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tobias Nipkow, Radha Poovendran, Richard Robinson, Krishna Sampigethaya, Mingyan Li, Oscar Slotosch and Olaf Müller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Functional Programming, Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience and International Journal of Information Security.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.