David T. R. Berry
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Ruth A. BaerMartha W. WetterFrederick A. SchmittB.A. PhillipsWilse B. WebbDona E. CragarToufic FakhouryDavid G. Lamb
- Topics
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research (37 papers)Psychological Testing and Assessment (15 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
David T. R. Berry
107 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Epidemiology 1.5k
- Clinical Psychology 1.4k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 832
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 752
Countries citing papers authored by David T. R. Berry
This map shows the geographic impact of David T. R. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David T. R. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David T. R. Berry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David T. R. Berry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David T. R. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David T. R. Berry. The network helps show where David T. R. Berry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David T. R. Berry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David T. R. Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David T. R. Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David T. R. Berry. David T. R. Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 148 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 69 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 46 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 126 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 54 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 88 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 60 |
About David T. R. Berry
David T. R. Berry is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 110 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (37 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (15 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (590 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.2k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (487 citations). David T. R. Berry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Ruth A. Baer, Martha W. Wetter, Frederick A. Schmitt, B.A. Phillips, Wilse B. Webb, Dona E. Cragar, Toufic Fakhoury, David G. Lamb, A. Jay Block and John D. Ranseen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, CHEST Journal and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.