David T. Kemp

9.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
51 papers, 6.0k citations indexed

About

David T. Kemp is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, David T. Kemp has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 6.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 papers in Sensory Systems and 14 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in David T. Kemp's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (40 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (40 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (14 papers). David T. Kemp is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (40 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (40 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (14 papers). David T. Kemp collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. David T. Kemp's co-authors include Peter Bray, Siobhán Ryan, Ann M. Brown, Richard Knight, Annie Moulin, D. Llanwyn Jones, R. Duclaux, A Morgon, E. Veuillet and Wenxuan He and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Physiology.

In The Last Decade

David T. Kemp

51 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Hit Papers

Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human audit... 1978 2026 1994 2010 1978 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David T. Kemp United Kingdom 33 5.4k 4.6k 2.3k 1.3k 981 51 6.0k
Jonathan Ashmore United Kingdom 39 4.3k 0.8× 2.5k 0.5× 1.3k 0.6× 192 0.2× 244 0.2× 120 5.7k
Graeme K. Yates Australia 31 2.2k 0.4× 2.0k 0.4× 589 0.3× 495 0.4× 129 0.1× 65 2.8k
J. M. Goldberg United States 36 3.9k 0.7× 3.9k 0.8× 5.3k 2.3× 182 0.1× 197 0.2× 45 8.8k
Paul Avan France 38 3.3k 0.6× 2.0k 0.4× 1.3k 0.6× 459 0.4× 744 0.8× 179 5.2k
William S. Rhode United States 33 3.9k 0.7× 3.9k 0.8× 547 0.2× 881 0.7× 161 0.2× 63 4.7k
B. M. Johnstone Australia 33 2.6k 0.5× 2.2k 0.5× 813 0.4× 628 0.5× 173 0.2× 64 3.4k
Hallowell Davis United States 37 2.3k 0.4× 3.8k 0.8× 712 0.3× 809 0.6× 282 0.3× 128 6.0k
Brenda L. Lonsbury‐Martin United States 43 5.1k 0.9× 4.2k 0.9× 2.3k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 1.0k 1.0× 107 5.5k
Glen K. Martin United States 40 4.5k 0.8× 3.8k 0.8× 2.0k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 852 0.9× 105 5.0k
Michael P. Gorga United States 50 5.3k 1.0× 5.2k 1.1× 1.4k 0.6× 1.7k 1.3× 1.7k 1.8× 146 6.5k

Countries citing papers authored by David T. Kemp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David T. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David T. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David T. Kemp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David T. Kemp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David T. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David T. Kemp. The network helps show where David T. Kemp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David T. Kemp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David T. Kemp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David T. Kemp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David T. Kemp. David T. Kemp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ren, Tianying, Wenxuan He, & David T. Kemp. (2016). Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113(35). 9910–9915. 99 indexed citations
2.
He, Wenxuan, Edward Porsov, David T. Kemp, Alfred L. Nuttall, & Tianying Ren. (2012). The Group Delay and Suppression Pattern of the Cochlear Microphonic Potential Recorded at the Round Window. PLoS ONE. 7(3). e34356–e34356. 26 indexed citations
4.
Kemp, David T.. (2002). Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. British Medical Bulletin. 63(1). 223–241. 344 indexed citations
5.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (2001). The feasibility of hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening in the United Kingdom. Scandinavian Audiology. 30(2). 22–28. 5 indexed citations
6.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1996). The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hearing Research. 94(1-2). 140–147. 34 indexed citations
7.
Moulin, Annie & David T. Kemp. (1996). Multicomponent acoustic distortion product otoacoustic emission phase in humans. I. General characteristics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100(3). 1617–1639. 42 indexed citations
8.
Berlín, Charles I., Linda J. Hood, Annette Hurley, Han Wen, & David T. Kemp. (1995). Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hearing Research. 87(1-2). 96–103. 84 indexed citations
9.
Zanten, Gijsbert A. van, et al.. (1995). Otoacoustic emissions. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 32. S213–S216. 5 indexed citations
10.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1994). Assessment of an Implementation of a Narrow Band, Neonatal Otoacoustic Emission Screening Method. Ear and Hearing. 15(6). 467–475. 19 indexed citations
11.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1994). The Objective Assessment of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonates. Ear and Hearing. 15(5). 371–377. 19 indexed citations
12.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1994). Quantitative Assessment of Methods for the Detection of Otoacoustic Emissions. Ear and Hearing. 15(5). 378–389. 26 indexed citations
13.
Grandori, F., Giancarlo Cianfrone, & David T. Kemp. (1993). Cochlear mechanisms and otoacoustic emissions. British Journal of Audiology. 27(2). 71–71. 3 indexed citations
14.
Ryan, S, David T. Kemp, & R. Hinchcliffe. (1991). The influence of contralateral acoustic stimulation on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans. British Journal of Audiology. 25(6). 391–397. 65 indexed citations
15.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1991). Otoacoustic Emission Tests in Neonatal Screening Programmes. Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 111(sup482). 73–84. 87 indexed citations
16.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1990). Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hearing Research. 43(2-3). 251–261. 373 indexed citations
17.
Kemp, David T., Siobhán Ryan, & Peter Bray. (1990). A Guide to the Effective Use of Otoacoustic Emissions. Ear and Hearing. 11(2). 93–105. 486 indexed citations
18.
Kemp, David T. & Mark Souter. (1988). A new rapid component in the cochlear response to brief electrical efferent stimulation: CM and otoacoustic observations. Hearing Research. 34(1). 49–62. 24 indexed citations
19.
Kemp, David T.. (1981). Physiologically Active Cochlear Micromechanics—One Source of Tinnitus. Novartis Foundation symposium. 85. 54–81. 70 indexed citations
20.
Kemp, David T., et al.. (1980). Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hearing Research. 2(3-4). 213–232. 141 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026