Ann M. Brown

1.3k total citations
21 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Ann M. Brown is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann M. Brown has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Sensory Systems and 4 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Ann M. Brown's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (4 papers). Ann M. Brown is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (4 papers). Ann M. Brown collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and United States. Ann M. Brown's co-authors include Sally A. Gaskill, David T. Kemp, Frances Harris, Andrew Forge, Paul T. Russell and Robert P. Carlyon and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Ann M. Brown

21 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ann M. Brown United Kingdom	17	984	831	383	242	165	21	1.1k
George Moushegian United States	21	743 0.8×	1.0k 1.3×	117 0.3×	192 0.8×	64 0.4×	50	1.3k
Flint A. Boettcher United States	23	1.2k 1.3×	1.1k 1.3×	324 0.8×	534 2.2×	42 0.3×	44	1.5k
Edward G. Pasanen United States	19	720 0.7×	763 0.9×	262 0.7×	302 1.2×	37 0.2×	43	1.1k
Herbert Voigt United States	18	869 0.9×	862 1.0×	121 0.3×	166 0.7×	42 0.3×	44	1.1k
Leslie W. Dodds United States	7	1.1k 1.1×	904 1.1×	340 0.9×	292 1.2×	49 0.3×	7	1.2k
Ben M. Clopton United States	16	617 0.6×	726 0.9×	98 0.3×	119 0.5×	52 0.3×	38	947
J.‐M. Aran France	24	1.1k 1.1×	752 0.9×	662 1.7×	119 0.5×	146 0.9×	67	1.5k
A. R. Cody Australia	16	1.1k 1.1×	974 1.2×	293 0.8×	288 1.2×	53 0.3×	24	1.2k
Evan M. Relkin United States	15	501 0.5×	584 0.7×	86 0.2×	161 0.7×	35 0.2×	27	721
Burt N. Evans United States	12	1.2k 1.2×	838 1.0×	367 1.0×	76 0.3×	84 0.5×	15	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Ann M. Brown

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann M. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann M. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann M. Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann M. Brown

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann M. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann M. Brown. The network helps show where Ann M. Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann M. Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann M. Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann M. Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann M. Brown. Ann M. Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Brown, Ann M., et al.. (1996). Feasibility of acoustic distortion product testing in newborns. British Journal of Audiology. 30(4). 261–274. 8 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M., et al.. (1996). Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 100(5). 3260–3267. 87 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M., et al.. (1995). Contralateral and ipsilateral suppression of the 2f1−f 2 distortion product in human subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 97(2). 1130–1140. 29 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M., et al.. (1994). Acoustic distortion products (ADP) from the ears of term infants and young adults using low stimulus levels. British Journal of Audiology. 28(4-5). 273–280. 24 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M.. (1994). Modulation of the hair cell motor: A possible source of odd-order distortion. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 96(4). 2210–2215. 18 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M., et al.. (1993). The effect of aspirin on cochlear mechanical tuning. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 93(6). 3298–3307. 29 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M.. (1993). Distortion in the cochlea: Acoustic f2−f1 at low stimulus levels. Hearing Research. 70(2). 160–166. 13 indexed citations

Gaskill, Sally A. & Ann M. Brown. (1993). Comparing the level of the acoustic distortion product 2f₁-f₂with behavioural threshold audiograms from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired ears. British Journal of Audiology. 27(6). 397–407. 19 indexed citations

Brown, Ann M., et al.. (1993). Acoustic distortion as a measure of frequency selectivity: Relation to psychophysical equivalent rectangular bandwidth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 93(6). 3291–3297. 30 indexed citations

10.

Gaskill, Sally A. & Ann M. Brown. (1990). The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1−f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 88(2). 821–839. 284 indexed citations

11.

Brown, Ann M. & Sally A. Gaskill. (1990). Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 88(2). 840–849. 84 indexed citations

12.

Brown, Ann M. & David T. Kemp. (1984). Suppressibility of the 2 f1- f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hearing Research. 13(1). 29–37. 201 indexed citations

13.

Kemp, David T. & Ann M. Brown. (1984). Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1- f2 distortion generated in the cochlea. Hearing Research. 13(1). 39–46. 67 indexed citations

14.

Forge, Andrew & Ann M. Brown. (1982). Ultrastructural and Electrophysiological Studies of Acute Ototoxic Effects of Furosemide. British Journal of Audiology. 16(2). 109–116. 32 indexed citations

15.

Brown, Ann M.. (1976). Ultrasound and communication in rodents. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Physiology. 53(4). 313–317. 16 indexed citations

16.

Brown, Ann M.. (1973). High frequency peaks in the cochlear microphonic response of rodents. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 83(4). 377–392. 39 indexed citations

17.

Brown, Ann M.. (1973). High levels of responsiveness from the inferior colliculus of rodents at ultrasonic frequencies. Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 83(4). 393–406. 57 indexed citations

18.

Brown, Ann M.. (1973). An investigation of the cochlear microphonic response of two species of echolocating bats:Rousettus aegyptiacus (geoffroy) andPipistrellus pipistrellus (Schreber). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 83(4). 407–413. 11 indexed citations

19.

Brown, Ann M.. (1971). High Frequency Responsiveness in Rodents at the Level of the Inferior Colliculus. Nature New Biology. 232(33). 223–224. 19 indexed citations

20.

Brown, Ann M.. (1970). Bimodal Cochlear Response Curves in Rodents. Nature. 228(5271). 576–577. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact