David Sitzer
Impact in
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 4
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment 1
-
- Aging and Gerontology Research 2
- Co-authors
- Elizabeth W. Twamley (3 shared papers)Susan R. McGurk (1 shared paper)Kim T. Mueser (1 shared paper)Gregory J. McHugo (1 shared paper)Dilip V. Jeste (5 shared papers)David J. Moore (3 shared papers)Colin A. Depp (3 shared papers)Jennifer Reichstadt (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (1 paper)American Journal of Psychiatry (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)Psychological Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Sitzer
6 papers receiving 1.6k citations
David Sitzer's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 198
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.1k
- Philosophy 325
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 322
- Biological Psychiatry 60
Countries citing papers authored by David Sitzer
This map shows the geographic impact of David Sitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Sitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Sitzer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Sitzer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Sitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Sitzer. The network helps show where David Sitzer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside David Sitzer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia Hit paper breakdown → | 2007 | 873 |
| 2 | 2006 | 323 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 310 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 89 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 21 |
About David Sitzer
David Sitzer is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 6 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Health disparities and outcomes (1 paper) and Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (198 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (1.1k citations), Philosophy (325 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (322 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (60 citations). David Sitzer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth W. Twamley, Susan R. McGurk, Kim T. Mueser, Gregory J. McHugo, Dilip V. Jeste, David J. Moore, Colin A. Depp, Jennifer Reichstadt, Lori P. Montross and John W. Daly. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.