Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Reconstruction of a Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in an Accelerating Universe
2000588 citationsB. Boisseau, Gilles Esposito-Farèse et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Conditions for the cosmological viability off(R)dark energy models
2007474 citationsLuca Amendola, Radouane Gannouji et al.Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmologyprofile →
Aref(R)Dark Energy Models Cosmologically Viable?
2007365 citationsLuca Amendola, David Polarski et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David Polarski
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Polarski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Polarski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Polarski more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Polarski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Polarski. The network helps show where David Polarski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Polarski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Polarski.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Polarski based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Polarski. David Polarski is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gannouji, Radouane, Leandros Perivolaropoulos, David Polarski, & Foteini Skara. (2021). Weak gravity on a ΛCDM background. Physical review. D. 103(6).7 indexed citations
4.
Moraes, Bruno & David Polarski. (2011). Complementarity of the redshift drift. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(10).12 indexed citations
5.
Ruiz‐Lapuente, P., Jean-Philippe Uzan, Roy Maartens, et al.. (2010). Dark Energy. Cambridge University Press eBooks.46 indexed citations
Boisseau, B., Gilles Esposito-Farèse, David Polarski, & Alexei A. Starobinsky. (2000). Reconstruction of a Scalar-Tensor Theory of Gravity in an Accelerating Universe. Physical Review Letters. 85(11). 2236–2239.588 indexed citations breakdown →
Lesgourgues, J., David Polarski, & Alexei A. Starobinsky. (1998). How large can be the primordial gravitational wave background in inflationary models. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
14.
Lesgourgues, Julien, S. Prunet, & David Polarski. (1998). Parameters extraction by Planck for a CDM model with BSI steplike primordial spectrum and cosmological constant. arXiv (Cornell University).1 indexed citations
15.
Polarski, David & Alexei A. Starobinsky. (1994). Isocurvature perturbations in multiple inflationary models. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 50(10). 6123–6129.130 indexed citations
Polarski, David. (1991). Infrared divergences in de Sitter space. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 43(6). 1892–1895.15 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.