David P. Collins

623 citations
8 papers · 359 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

David P. Collins

7 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers

David P. Collins
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 228
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 205
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 15
  • Developmental Neuroscience 16
Replace Malte Feja with:
Malte Feja Germany
Costanza Burattini Italy
E.A. Tolmacheva Russia
Usman Farooq Singapore
Simone Pfarr Germany
Michelle R. Breier United States
Huiwen Zhu China
Marion Jalabert France
Cian McCafferty United States
Geoffrey A. Dilly United States
David P. Collins relative to Malte Feja Germany Malte Feja's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Malte Feja · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David P. Collins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David P. Collins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David P. Collins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David P. Collins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David P. Collins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David P. Collins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David P. Collins. The network helps show where David P. Collins may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside David P. Collins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David P. Collins Line = papers co-authored together David P. Collins links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 2018141
2 202088
3 201656
4 201739
5 201624
6 20168
7 20243
8 20250

About David P. Collins

David P. Collins is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (1 paper), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (1 paper) and Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (228 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (205 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (15 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (16 citations). David P. Collins has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Adam G. Carter, Paul G. Anastasiades, Ramesh Chittajallu, Chris J. McBain, Kenneth A. Pelkey, Geoffrey Vargish, Xiaoming Yuan, Xiaoqing Yuan, Steven Hunt and Jason C. Wester. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, Molecular Psychiatry, BMC Neurology, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact