M. William Rochlin

723 citations
19 papers · 603 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

M. William Rochlin

19 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

M. William Rochlin
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Developmental Neuroscience 117
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 319
  • Cell Biology 274
  • Sensory Systems 64
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 88
Replace Wendy Akmentin with:
Wendy Akmentin United States
Elena Caminos Spain
Mitra Cowan Canada
Craig L. Brumwell United States
Prof Cameron United States
Jeremy C. McIntyre United States
Tzy-Wen L. Gong United States
Raghavan Madhavan Hong Kong
R.O. Lockerbie France
Rebecca K. Chance United States
M. William Rochlin relative to Wendy Akmentin United States Wendy Akmentin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Wendy Akmentin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. William Rochlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. William Rochlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. William Rochlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. William Rochlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. William Rochlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. William Rochlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. William Rochlin. The network helps show where M. William Rochlin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. William Rochlin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. William Rochlin Line = papers co-authored together M. William Rochlin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1995167
2 1996100
3 199974
4 200046
5 199837
6 198927
7 201025
8 200425
9 201220
10 200417
11 198914
12 200513
13 200410
14 20168
15 20218
16 19945
17 19903
18
Mechanisms of neuromuscular junction development studied in tissue culture
19882
19 20002

About M. William Rochlin

M. William Rochlin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Developmental Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 603 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (10 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (9 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (2 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers) and Cellular Mechanics and Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (117 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (319 citations), Cell Biology (274 citations), Sensory Systems (64 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (88 citations). M. William Rochlin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Paul C. Bridgman, Kazuyuki Itoh, Robert Adelstein, Albert I. Farbman, Michael E. Dailey, Roman J. Giger, Joost Verhaagen, H. Benjamin Peng, Qiming Chen and M. Tobler. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience, Journal of Cell Science, Journal of Neurocytology and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact