David Monniaux
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Software top 1%
- Hardware and Architecture top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Patrick CousotLaurent MauborgneRadhia CousotXavier RivalBruno BlanchetJérôme FerêtAntoine MinéMatthieu Moy
- Topics
- Formal Methods in Verification (17 papers)Logic, programming, and type systems (13 papers)Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
David Monniaux
29 papers receiving 688 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 483
- Artificial Intelligence 439
- Software 305
- Hardware and Architecture 232
- Information Systems 139
Countries citing papers authored by David Monniaux
This map shows the geographic impact of David Monniaux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Monniaux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Monniaux more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Monniaux
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Monniaux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Monniaux. The network helps show where David Monniaux may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Monniaux
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Monniaux. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Monniaux based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Monniaux. David Monniaux is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 105 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | Open Source vs. Capitalism and Communism | 1 |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 248 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 154 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Design and Implementation of a Special-Purpose Static Program Analyzer for Safety-Critical Real-Time Embedded Software, invited chapter | 17 |
About David Monniaux
David Monniaux is a scholar working on Software, Hardware and Architecture and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (17 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (13 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (305 citations), Hardware and Architecture (232 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (483 citations). David Monniaux has collaborated with scholars based in France, Burundi and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include Patrick Cousot, Laurent Mauborgne, Radhia Cousot, Xavier Rival, Bruno Blanchet, Jérôme Ferêt, Antoine Miné, Matthieu Moy, Claire Maïza and Jan Reineke. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, ACM SIGPLAN Notices and ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.