David M. Gunn
- Religious studies top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 5%
- Development top 5%
- History top 10%
- Co-authors
- Danna Nolan FewellI. VetharaniamJamés S. AckermanDavid J. A. ClinesJ. A. EmertonAlan J. HauserPhilip R. DaviesDiana Edelman
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (19 papers)Development, Ethics, and Society (8 papers)Archaeology and Historical Studies (7 papers)
- Journals
- Philosophy of ScienceJournal of Biblical LiteratureJournal of the American Oriental Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David M. Gunn
21 papers receiving 97 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Religious studies 145
- Sociology and Political Science 71
- Archeology 48
- Development 36
- History 26
Countries citing papers authored by David M. Gunn
This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Gunn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Gunn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Gunn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Gunn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Gunn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Gunn. The network helps show where David M. Gunn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Gunn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Gunn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Gunn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Gunn. David M. Gunn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Narrative And Novella In Samuel | 0 |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Colonialism and the vagaries of scripture: Te Kooti in Canaan (A story of Bible and dispossession in Aotearoa/New Zealand) | 1 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | Gender, Power, and Promise: The Subject of the Bible's First Story | 36 |
| 7 | Compromising Redemption: Relating Characters in the Book of Ruth | 15 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About David M. Gunn
David M. Gunn is a scholar working on Religious studies, Development and Archeology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (19 papers), Development, Ethics, and Society (8 papers) and Archaeology and Historical Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (145 citations), Development (36 citations) and Archeology (48 citations). David M. Gunn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Danna Nolan Fewell, I. Vetharaniam, Jamés S. Ackerman, David J. A. Clines, J. A. Emerton, Alan J. Hauser, Philip R. Davies, Diana Edelman, Tod Linafelt and Timothy Beal. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Journal of Biblical Literature and Journal of the American Oriental Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.