Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism
2005594 citationsDavid Levi‐FaurThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David Levi‐Faur
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Levi‐Faur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Levi‐Faur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Levi‐Faur more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Levi‐Faur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Levi‐Faur. The network helps show where David Levi‐Faur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Levi‐Faur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Levi‐Faur.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Levi‐Faur based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Levi‐Faur. David Levi‐Faur is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Levi‐Faur, David. (2014). Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press eBooks.40 indexed citations
6.
Maggetti, Martino & David Levi‐Faur. (2013). Dealing with Errors in QCA. Political Research Quarterly. 66(1). 198.40 indexed citations
7.
Jordana, Jacint & David Levi‐Faur. (2012). The politics of regulation : institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance. Edward Elgar eBooks.64 indexed citations
Levi‐Faur, David. (2011). The Regulatory State and Regulatory Capitalism: An Institutional Perspective. Chapters.5 indexed citations
10.
Levi‐Faur, David & Christine Parker. (2010). Three narratives of the Global Financial Crisis. Socio-Economic Review. 8. 547–553.3 indexed citations
11.
Levi‐Faur, David. (2007). The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism. SSRN Electronic Journal.19 indexed citations
12.
Jordana, Jacint & David Levi‐Faur. (2007). The Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism in Latin America Sectoral and National Channels in the Making of New Order. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
Jordana, Jacint, et al.. (2005). The Limits of Europeanization: Regulatory Reforms in the Spanish and Portuguese Telecommunications and Electricity Sectors. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
15.
Levi‐Faur, David & Jacint Jordana. (2005). The Making of a New Regulatory Order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.16 indexed citations
16.
Levi‐Faur, David, et al.. (2005). The limits of Europeanization: regulatory reforms in the Spanish and Portuguese telecommunications and electricity sectors. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 9(9). 10.2 indexed citations
17.
Levi‐Faur, David, et al.. (2004). International public policy and management : policy learning beyond regional, cultural, and political boundaries. Marcel Dekker eBooks.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.