David Lesniak
About
In The Last Decade
David Lesniak
10 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cancer Research 251
- Oncology 240
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 139
- Molecular Biology 115
- Surgery 86
Countries citing papers authored by David Lesniak
This map shows the geographic impact of David Lesniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lesniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lesniak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Lesniak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lesniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lesniak. The network helps show where David Lesniak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Lesniak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Lesniak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Lesniak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Lesniak. David Lesniak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 53 | |
| 9 | 247 | |
| 10 | 77 | |
| 11 | 71 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.