David Lemmings
- History top 2%
- Scottish History and National Identity 2
- Law top 5%
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies 2
-
- Historical Economic and Legal Thought 5
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 4
- Historical Legal Studies and Society 3
-
- Historical Economic and Social Studies 4
-
- Crime, Deviance, and Social Control 2
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Claire WalkerBrian P. LevacκRobert Phiddian
- Cited by
- HistoryLawGeneral Psychology
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (1 paper)The Historical Journal (1 paper)Law and History Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Australia
In The Last Decade
David Lemmings
14 papers receiving 112 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- History 69
- Law 34
- General Psychology 3
- Political Science and International Relations 46
- Anthropology 16
Countries citing papers authored by David Lemmings
This map shows the geographic impact of David Lemmings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Lemmings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Lemmings more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Lemmings
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Lemmings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Lemmings. The network helps show where David Lemmings may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside David Lemmings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 3 | Passions, Sympathy and Print Culture: Public Opinion and Emotional Authenticity in Eighteenth-Century Britain | 2016 | 7 |
| 4 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 5 | Emotions and Social Change : Historical and Sociological Perspectives | 2014 | 22 |
| 6 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 7 | Law and Government in England during the Long Eighteenth Century: From Consent to Command | 2011 | 8 |
| 8 | 2009 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | The British and their laws in the eighteenth century | 2005 | 17 |
| 11 | 2000 | 18 | |
| 12 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1990 | 19 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1 |
About David Lemmings
David Lemmings is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 16 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Economic and Legal Thought (5 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (4 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Historical Legal Studies and Society (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (69 citations), Law (34 citations) and General Psychology (3 citations). David Lemmings has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Claire Walker, Brian P. Levacκ and Robert Phiddian. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Historical Journal and Law and History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.