David J. Earl
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Inorganic Chemistry top 5%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 10%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael W. DeemMark R. WilsonVishal GuptaRamdas S. PophaleFangyong YanC. M. PooleyIrene BredbergJulia M. Yeomans
- Topics
- Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (10 papers)Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers)Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPhysical Review LettersAngewandte Chemie International Edition
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
David J. Earl
30 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 154
- Materials Chemistry 699
- Molecular Biology 509
- Inorganic Chemistry 346
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 344
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 271
Countries citing papers authored by David J. Earl
This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Earl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Earl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Earl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Earl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Earl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Earl. The network helps show where David J. Earl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Earl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Earl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Earl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Earl. David J. Earl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 146 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | Parallel Tempering: Theory, Applications, and New Perspectivesbreakdown → | 722 |
| 7 | 117 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 82 | |
| 10 | 125 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 135 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 76 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 171 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About David J. Earl
David J. Earl is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Condensed Matter Physics and Spectroscopy, having authored 30 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Liquid Crystal Research Advancements (10 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (6 papers) and Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Inorganic Chemistry (346 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (244 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (344 citations). David J. Earl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael W. Deem, Mark R. Wilson, Vishal Gupta, Ramdas S. Pophale, Fangyong Yan, C. M. Pooley, Irene Bredberg, Julia M. Yeomans, J. F. Ryder and Maureen P. Neal. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.