David Gray

781 total citations
39 papers, 590 citations indexed

About

David Gray is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Agronomy and Crop Science and Forestry. According to data from OpenAlex, David Gray has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 590 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 8 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 7 papers in Forestry. Recurrent topics in David Gray's work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (17 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (8 papers) and Pasture and Agricultural Systems (7 papers). David Gray is often cited by papers focused on Agricultural Innovations and Practices (17 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (8 papers) and Pasture and Agricultural Systems (7 papers). David Gray collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and Sri Lanka. David Gray's co-authors include Peter Kemp, P. R. Kenyon, Brennon Wood, Alison Sewell, H. T. Blair, S. T. Morris, B. T. Dela Rue, Callum Eastwood, Laurens Klerkx and Stephen T. Morris and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Rural Studies and Agricultural Systems.

In The Last Decade

David Gray

35 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Gray New Zealand 12 295 119 80 68 67 39 590
Kevin Heanue Ireland 14 318 1.1× 112 0.9× 65 0.8× 80 1.2× 66 1.0× 29 618
Jim Kinsella Ireland 15 264 0.9× 154 1.3× 106 1.3× 41 0.6× 59 0.9× 40 638
Áine Macken‐Walsh Ireland 17 338 1.1× 122 1.0× 52 0.7× 53 0.8× 54 0.8× 50 653
Godswill Makombe South Africa 15 233 0.8× 96 0.8× 106 1.3× 63 0.9× 73 1.1× 47 658
Ann Waters‐Bayer France 11 306 1.0× 152 1.3× 123 1.5× 43 0.6× 69 1.0× 50 678
D.L. Romney United Kingdom 15 345 1.2× 184 1.5× 134 1.7× 85 1.3× 148 2.2× 91 846
Ranjitha Puskur Philippines 12 308 1.0× 133 1.1× 182 2.3× 84 1.2× 55 0.8× 46 685
O Morgan United Kingdom 5 338 1.1× 156 1.3× 62 0.8× 132 1.9× 55 0.8× 9 669
Ronnie Vernooy Italy 17 322 1.1× 286 2.4× 97 1.2× 67 1.0× 55 0.8× 81 966
C.J.M. Ondersteijn Netherlands 10 228 0.8× 114 1.0× 42 0.5× 91 1.3× 46 0.7× 17 611

Countries citing papers authored by David Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gray. The network helps show where David Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Gray. David Gray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McNair, Lisa, et al.. (2024). The Critic as Designer: How Metacognition Makes Transdisciplinarity Possible. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings.
2.
Gray, David, et al.. (2022). The impacts of the COVID-19 shock on sustainability and farmer livelihoods in Sri Lanka. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 4. 100131–100131. 15 indexed citations
3.
Fielke, Simon, et al.. (2017). Lessons for co-innovation in agricultural innovation systems: a multiple case study analysis and a conceptual model. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 24(1). 9–27. 42 indexed citations
4.
Eastwood, Callum, B. T. Dela Rue, & David Gray. (2016). Using a ‘network of practice’ approach to match grazing decision-support system design with farmer practice. Animal Production Science. 57(7). 1536–1542. 30 indexed citations
5.
Wood, Brennon, H. T. Blair, David Gray, et al.. (2014). Agricultural Science in the Wild: A Social Network Analysis of Farmer Knowledge Exchange. PLoS ONE. 9(8). e105203–e105203. 165 indexed citations
6.
Gray, David, et al.. (2013). Enriching the farm-management consultancy theory: Practice nexus. 9(1). 99. 1 indexed citations
7.
Garnevska, Elena, et al.. (2013). Factors Affecting Rice Adoption in the Solomon Islands : a Case Study of Fiu Village, Malaita Province. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych Seria G Ekonomika Rolnictwa. 100(4). 51–61. 2 indexed citations
8.
Bolwell, Charlotte F., et al.. (2013). Identifying the Research Information Needs of the Racing and Breeding Industries in New Zealand: Results of an Online Survey. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 33(9). 690–696. 8 indexed citations
9.
Gray, David, et al.. (2011). Beyond Recurrent Costs: An Institutional Analysis of the Unsustainability of Donor-Supported Reforms in Agricultural Extension. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education. 18(1). 5–18. 8 indexed citations
10.
Gray, David, et al.. (2011). The management of risk in a dryland environment. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 13–21. 8 indexed citations
11.
Gray, David, et al.. (2011). A PLANNING PROCESS FOR IMPROVING DECENTRALISED AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION PROVISION BASED ON A GHANAIAN CASE STUDY.
12.
Gray, David, et al.. (2010). Towards A Cross-Sector Pluralistic Agricultural Extension System in A Decentralized Policy Context: A Ghanaian Case Study. Journal of sustainable development in Africa. 12(4). 1–10. 12 indexed citations
13.
Gray, David, et al.. (2009). Key Factors of Success for Decentralized Public Agricultural Extension: An Expanded View from a Ghanaian Case Study. Journal of sustainable development in Africa. 10(4). 233–249. 4 indexed citations
14.
Gray, David, et al.. (2009). Improving Agricultural Extension Human Resource Capacity in a Decentralized Policy Context: A Ghanaian Case Study. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education. 16(2). 11 indexed citations
15.
Gray, David, Peter Kemp, P. R. Kenyon, et al.. (2008). Strategies used to manage climatic risk: Lessons from farmers with expertise in dryland farming. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 59–68. 8 indexed citations
16.
Gray, David, W.J. Parker, Peter Kemp, et al.. (2003). Feed planning - alternative approaches used by farmers. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 211–217. 5 indexed citations
17.
Gray, David, et al.. (2002). Using the KADS methodology: expert systems in farm management. 44. 262–265.
18.
Gray, David, et al.. (2002). The pros and cons of using FACET for analysing qualitative data. 208–215. 1 indexed citations
19.
Parker, W.J., Nicola M. Shadbolt, & David Gray. (1997). Strategic planning in grassland farming: Principles andapplications. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association. 191–197. 6 indexed citations
20.
Parker, W.J., et al.. (1994). Farm management research in New Zealand and its contribution to animal production. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production. 54. 357–362. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026