David Glasgow

400 total citations
12 papers, 256 citations indexed

About

David Glasgow is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, David Glasgow has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 256 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Gender Studies and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in David Glasgow's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). David Glasgow is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (4 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). David Glasgow collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Switzerland. David Glasgow's co-authors include Rachel Calam, Antony Cox, A. D. Cox, Andreas Mokros, Volker Heinz, D. Richard Laws, Carmen L.Z. Gress, Richard P. Bentall, Joachim Nitschke and R. Glynn Owens and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Health & Social Care in the Community and Sexual Abuse.

In The Last Decade

David Glasgow

9 papers receiving 228 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Glasgow United Kingdom 8 195 75 40 33 32 12 256
Kristen D’Eramo United States 6 186 1.0× 74 1.0× 13 0.3× 27 0.8× 19 0.6× 6 260
Krisann M. Alvarez United States 6 229 1.2× 72 1.0× 31 0.8× 49 1.5× 12 0.4× 7 310
Vivien Prior United Kingdom 9 250 1.3× 74 1.0× 25 0.6× 28 0.8× 9 0.3× 14 336
Ruth S. Kempe United States 10 242 1.2× 57 0.8× 54 1.4× 44 1.3× 27 0.8× 18 315
Jacqueline Horan Australia 8 269 1.4× 72 1.0× 28 0.7× 59 1.8× 9 0.3× 23 378
Louise Sas Canada 6 366 1.9× 47 0.6× 14 0.3× 53 1.6× 21 0.7× 9 391
Louanne Lawson United States 8 274 1.4× 56 0.7× 23 0.6× 53 1.6× 64 2.0× 24 321
Billie F. Corder United States 10 257 1.3× 75 1.0× 12 0.3× 28 0.8× 17 0.5× 24 331
Ronald L. Scott United States 10 231 1.2× 64 0.9× 9 0.2× 27 0.8× 47 1.5× 18 296
Margaret Lake Canada 7 163 0.8× 67 0.9× 23 0.6× 31 0.9× 30 0.9× 7 317

Countries citing papers authored by David Glasgow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Glasgow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Glasgow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Glasgow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Glasgow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Glasgow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Glasgow. The network helps show where David Glasgow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Glasgow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Glasgow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Glasgow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Glasgow. David Glasgow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Mokros, Andreas, Volker Heinz, Joachim Nitschke, et al.. (2012). Computerized Assessment of Pedophilic Sexual Interest Through Self-Report and Viewing Time. Sexual Abuse. 25(3). 230–258. 18 indexed citations
2.
Glasgow, David. (2010). The potential of digital evidence to contribute to risk assessment of internet offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression. 16(1). 87–106. 31 indexed citations
3.
Glasgow, David. (2008). The Law of the Jungle: Advocating for Animals in Australia. Deakin Law Review. 13(1). 181–181. 1 indexed citations
4.
Hutton, Jane L., et al.. (2007). Professionals’ beliefs about indicators of child sexual abuse. Health & Social Care in the Community. 1(4). 219–226.
5.
Glasgow, David, et al.. (2003). An assessment tool for investigating paedophile sexual interest using viewing time: an application of single case methodology. British Journal of Learning Disabilities. 31(2). 96–102. 39 indexed citations
6.
Calam, Rachel, et al.. (2000). Can computer-based assessment help us understand children's pain?. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 17(5). 284–288. 13 indexed citations
7.
Calam, Rachel, et al.. (2000). Can computer-based assessment help us understand children's pain?. European Journal of Anaesthesiology. 17(5). 284–288. 19 indexed citations
8.
Calam, Rachel, et al.. (2000). Assessment and Therapy with Children: Can Computers Help?. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 5(3). 329–343. 37 indexed citations
9.
Calam, Rachel, et al.. (1998). Psychological disturbance and child sexual abuse: a follow-up study. Child Abuse & Neglect. 22(9). 901–913. 69 indexed citations
10.
11.
Glasgow, David & Richard P. Bentall. (1989). What do expert witnesses in child sexual abuse think they are doing? ? ?Diagnosis?, and the sexually accurate doll ?test? as professional myths. Liverpool Law Review. 11(1). 43–57. 4 indexed citations
12.
Glasgow, David, et al.. (1986). Current Issues in Clinical Psychology: 1985 Annual Merseyside Course in Clinical Psychology. Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kristen D’Eramo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Krisann M. Alvarez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vivien Prior Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth S. Kempe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacqueline Horan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louise Sas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louanne Lawson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Billie F. Corder Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ronald L. Scott Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Margaret Lake
Rankless by CCL
2026