David Gay
- Geometry and Topology top 5%
- Mathematical Physics top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 10%
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics top 10%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- William VélezRobion KirbyAndrás I. StipsiczMatt WelshPhilip LevisDavid CullerKevin K. ChangE. Ascher
- Topics
- Geometric and Algebraic Topology (17 papers)Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (12 papers)Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of Applied MechanicsMathematics of Computation
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
David Gay
37 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Geometry and Topology 147
- Mathematical Physics 106
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 68
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 49
- Computer Networks and Communications 46
Countries citing papers authored by David Gay
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Gay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gay. The network helps show where David Gay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Gay. David Gay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About David Gay
David Gay is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geometric and Algebraic Topology (17 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (12 papers) and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (147 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (49 citations) and Mathematical Physics (106 citations). David Gay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include William Vélez, Robion Kirby, András I. Stipsicz, Matt Welsh, Philip Levis, David Culler, Kevin K. Chang, E. Ascher, William J. Cody and W. Kahan. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Applied Mechanics and Mathematics of Computation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.