Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs
2008634 citationsDavid Gadenne, Jessica Kennedy et al.Journal of Business Ethicsprofile →
The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours
2011478 citationsDavid Gadenne, Bishnu Prasad Sharma et al.Energy Policyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gadenne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gadenne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gadenne more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gadenne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gadenne. The network helps show where David Gadenne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gadenne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gadenne.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gadenne based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Gadenne. David Gadenne is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gadenne, David, Bishnu Prasad Sharma, Don Kerr, & Timothy F. Smith. (2011). The influence of consumers' environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy Policy. 39(12). 7684–7694.478 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Gadenne, David, et al.. (2009). Balanced Scorecard Implementation in the Public Sector: Lessons Learnt in a Large Local Government Authority. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast).3 indexed citations
Baxter, Peter J. & David Gadenne. (2008). Audit Committee Characteristics: An Australian Empirical Study. USC Research Bank (University of the Sunshine Coast).
8.
Gadenne, David, et al.. (2008). An Empirical Study of Environmental Awareness and Practices in SMEs. Journal of Business Ethics. 84(1). 45–63.634 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Routledge, James & David Gadenne. (2007). The effect of changing firm characteristics on capacity to restructure. International Journal of Business. 15(2). 1–12.2 indexed citations
10.
Gadenne, David, et al.. (2006). Australian Social and Environmental NGOs: A Study of their Influencing Activities on Corporate Social Disclosure. Figshare.3 indexed citations
Gadenne, David & Bishnu Sharma. (2005). Quality management factors in SMEs : an investigation of their effect on organisational performance. Acquire (CQUniversity).1 indexed citations
Gadenne, David, et al.. (2004). A Study of External Pressure Groups: Users of Corporate Social Disclosure. Acquire (CQUniversity).2 indexed citations
15.
Gadenne, David, et al.. (2003). An examination of differences between corporate environmental disclosure practices within voluntary and mandatory disclosure systems in Australia. Acquire (CQUniversity).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.