David G. Schramm
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Demography top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Adam M. GalovanJames P. MarshallFrancesca Adler‐BaederThomas R. LeeVictor W. HarrisBrian J. HigginbothamH. Wallace GoddardJennifer L. Kerpelman
- Topics
- Family Dynamics and Relationships (33 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (24 papers)Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (20 papers)
- Cited by
- DemographySocial PsychologyHealth
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of Family PsychologyFamily Relations
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
David G. Schramm
52 papers receiving 767 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Sociology and Political Science 435
- Social Psychology 422
- Demography 408
- Clinical Psychology 182
- Health 159
Countries citing papers authored by David G. Schramm
This map shows the geographic impact of David G. Schramm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David G. Schramm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David G. Schramm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David G. Schramm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David G. Schramm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David G. Schramm. The network helps show where David G. Schramm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David G. Schramm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David G. Schramm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David G. Schramm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David G. Schramm. David G. Schramm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 61 |
About David G. Schramm
David G. Schramm is a scholar working on Demography, Social Psychology and Health, having authored 57 papers that have together received 839 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (33 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (24 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (408 citations), Social Psychology (422 citations) and Health (159 citations). David G. Schramm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Adam M. Galovan, James P. Marshall, Francesca Adler‐Baeder, Thomas R. Lee, Victor W. Harris, Brian J. Higginbotham, H. Wallace Goddard, Jennifer L. Kerpelman, Jonathan R. Olson and Jeremy B. Kanter. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Family Psychology and Family Relations.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.