David G. Dodwell

553 total citations
10 papers, 345 citations indexed

About

David G. Dodwell is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, David G. Dodwell has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 345 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Ophthalmology, 4 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 2 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in David G. Dodwell's work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers). David G. Dodwell is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (4 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers). David G. Dodwell collaborates with scholars based in United States, Lebanon and Ireland. David G. Dodwell's co-authors include David V. Weinberg, Richard F. Dreyer, Daniel B. Roth, Michael Singer, Antonio Capone, John G. Walt, David Hollander, Kean T. Oh, Lee M. Jampol and Michael A. Rosenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Ophthalmology, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

In The Last Decade

David G. Dodwell

10 papers receiving 324 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David G. Dodwell United States 8 327 154 28 24 14 10 345
Fábio Bom Aggio Brazil 11 329 1.0× 149 1.0× 26 0.9× 38 1.6× 10 0.7× 20 365
Mitsuhiro Imasawa Japan 10 280 0.9× 188 1.2× 21 0.8× 22 0.9× 9 0.6× 18 294
Nikolaos Dervenis Greece 9 202 0.6× 181 1.2× 28 1.0× 17 0.7× 10 0.7× 22 233
Wataru Kikushima Japan 14 525 1.6× 373 2.4× 41 1.5× 39 1.6× 10 0.7× 42 551
Frederic Gunnemann Germany 11 290 0.9× 223 1.4× 27 1.0× 45 1.9× 13 0.9× 16 320
Andrew C. Westfall United States 7 280 0.9× 165 1.1× 27 1.0× 21 0.9× 13 0.9× 9 321
Steven Bloom United States 9 355 1.1× 227 1.5× 19 0.7× 32 1.3× 24 1.7× 28 394
Christina M. Klais United States 10 304 0.9× 197 1.3× 40 1.4× 25 1.0× 16 1.1× 17 337
Marco Zagari Italy 6 361 1.1× 220 1.4× 17 0.6× 36 1.5× 16 1.1× 12 374
Koji Jian Japan 4 341 1.0× 195 1.3× 45 1.6× 40 1.7× 9 0.6× 5 350

Countries citing papers authored by David G. Dodwell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David G. Dodwell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David G. Dodwell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David G. Dodwell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David G. Dodwell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David G. Dodwell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David G. Dodwell. The network helps show where David G. Dodwell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David G. Dodwell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David G. Dodwell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David G. Dodwell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David G. Dodwell. David G. Dodwell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
2.
Dugel, Pravin U., Antonio Capone, Michael Singer, et al.. (2015). Two or more dexamethasone intravitreal implants in treatment-naïve patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion: subgroup analysis of a retrospective chart review study. BMC Ophthalmology. 15(1). 118–118. 12 indexed citations
4.
Dodwell, David G., et al.. (2015). Sterile endophthalmitis rates and particle size analyses of different formulations of triamcinolone acetonide. Clinical ophthalmology. 9. 1033–1033. 21 indexed citations
5.
Parodi, Maurízio Battaglia, Pierluigi Iacono, Umberto De Benedetto, et al.. (2013). INTRAVITREAL BEVACIZUMAB FOR JUXTAFOVEAL CHOROIDAL NEOVASCULARIZATION SECONDARY TO MULTIFOCAL CHOROIDITIS. Retina. 33(5). 953–956. 9 indexed citations
6.
Capone, Antonio, Michael Singer, David G. Dodwell, et al.. (2013). EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TWO OR MORE DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT INJECTIONS FOR TREATMENT OF MACULAR EDEMA RELATED TO RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION (SHASTA STUDY). Retina. 34(2). 342–351. 92 indexed citations
7.
Dodwell, David G., et al.. (2009). Sterile Endophthalmitis Secondary to Intravitreal Triesence (Triamcinolone Acetonide). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 50(13). 3565–3565. 3 indexed citations
8.
Mansour, Ahmad M., J. Fernando Arévalo, Focke Ziemssen, et al.. (2009). Long-term Visual Outcomes of Intravitreal Bevacizumab in Inflammatory Ocular Neovascularization. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 148(2). 310–316.e2. 50 indexed citations
9.
Dodwell, David G., et al.. (1990). Optic Nerve Involvement Associated with the multiple Evanescent White-dot Syndrome. Ophthalmology. 97(7). 862–868. 29 indexed citations
10.
Weinberg, David V., et al.. (1990). Anatomy of Arteriovenous Crossings in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 109(3). 298–302. 108 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026