David G. Decker
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Surgery top 10%
- Ecology top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael L. AveryElizabeth MusseyGeorge D. MalkasianJohn S. HumphreyMalcolm B. DockertyMaurice J. WebbRobert C. YoungGeorge D. Wilbanks
- Topics
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (21 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (18 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
David G. Decker
85 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Reproductive Medicine 903
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 555
- Surgery 357
- Ecology 344
- Oncology 318
Countries citing papers authored by David G. Decker
This map shows the geographic impact of David G. Decker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David G. Decker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David G. Decker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David G. Decker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David G. Decker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David G. Decker. The network helps show where David G. Decker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David G. Decker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David G. Decker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David G. Decker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David G. Decker. David G. Decker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | [Women in surgery--equal surgeons]. | 1 |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | REDUCING BLACKBIRD DAMAGE TO NEWLY PLANTED RICE WITH A NONTOXIC CLAY-BASED SEED COATING | 33 |
| 10 | ASSESSMENT OF BIRD DAMAGE TO EARLY-RIPENING BLUEBERRIES IN FLORIDA | 12 |
| 11 | PROLONGED SEED HANDLING TIME DETERS RED-WINGED BLACKBIRDS FEEDING ON RICE SEED | 14 |
| 12 | FLIGHT PEN EVALUATION OF EYESPOT BALLOONS TO PROTECT CITRUS FROM BIRD DEPREDATIONS | 4 |
| 13 | 50 | |
| 14 | Obsesivos días circulares | 3 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About David G. Decker
David G. Decker is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Ecology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (21 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (18 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (903 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (555 citations) and Insect Science (168 citations). David G. Decker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael L. Avery, Elizabeth Mussey, George D. Malkasian, John S. Humphrey, Malcolm B. Dockerty, Maurice J. Webb, Robert C. Young, George D. Wilbanks, Leslie A. Walton and Susan S. Ellenberg. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.