David Fraser

1.2k citations
33 papers · 921 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

David Fraser

32 papers receiving 893 citations

Peers

David Fraser
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Applied Psychology 296
  • Physiology 622
  • General Health Professions 184
  • Speech and Hearing 47
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 193
Replace Tom Thompson with:
Tom Thompson United Kingdom
Vijay Nair United States
Michèle Tremblay Canada
Juhan Lee United States
Ryan Lantini United States
Roma Robertson United Kingdom
Angela Fidler Pfammatter United States
Jeffrey P. Migneault United States
Sydney R. Parker United States
Robert Wallace Australia
David Fraser relative to Tom Thompson United Kingdom Tom Thompson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Tom Thompson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Fraser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Fraser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fraser. The network helps show where David Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Fraser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Fraser Line = papers co-authored together David Fraser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009190
2 2016132
3 201566
4 201564
5 201150
6 201546
7 201739
8 201539
9 201436
10 201234
11 201831
12 201231
13 201831
14 201220
15 201816
16 201114
17 201213
18 201013
19
Changing clinical practice, helping people quit: the Wisconsin Cessation Outreach model.
20059
20 20108

About David Fraser

David Fraser is a scholar working on Physiology, Computer Networks and Communications, Hardware and Architecture, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 33 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (15 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (8 papers), Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Interconnection Networks and Systems (4 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (296 citations), Physiology (622 citations), General Health Professions (184 citations), Speech and Hearing (47 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (193 citations). David Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Timothy B. Baker, Michael C. Fiore, Stevens S. Smith, Megan E. Piper, Douglas E. Jorenby, Tanya R. Schlam, Daniel M. Bolt, Linda M. Collins, Jessica W. Cook and Robert T. Adsit. Their work appears in journals such as Addiction, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Translational Behavioral Medicine, JAMA and JAMA Network Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact