David F. Pocock
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Sister MechtraudÉmile DurkheimMax WeberÁkos ÖstörNur YalmanRonald IndenJim WhitmanUrsula Sharma
- Topics
- South Asian Studies and Conflicts (7 papers)African history and culture analysis (3 papers)Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Sociological Review
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
David F. Pocock
30 papers receiving 432 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Sociology and Political Science 328
- Political Science and International Relations 171
- Anthropology 151
- Philosophy 84
- Economics and Econometrics 48
Countries citing papers authored by David F. Pocock
This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Pocock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Pocock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Pocock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Pocock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Pocock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Pocock. The network helps show where David F. Pocock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David F. Pocock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David F. Pocock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David F. Pocock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David F. Pocock. David F. Pocock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | The Hinduism Omnibus | 1 |
| 3 | After Rwanda : the coordination of United Nations humanitarian assistance | 19 |
| 4 | 40 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Mind, body, and wealth;: A study of belief and practice in an Indian village | 42 |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | The Ismaili Khojas of East Africa | 2 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 97 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 131 |
About David F. Pocock
David F. Pocock is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and Religious studies, having authored 33 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include South Asian Studies and Conflicts (7 papers), African history and culture analysis (3 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (151 citations), Philosophy (84 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (328 citations). David F. Pocock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sister Mechtraud, Émile Durkheim, Max Weber, Ákos Östör, Nur Yalman, Ronald Inden, Jim Whitman, Ursula Sharma, James Silverberg and Victor Barnouw. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and American Sociological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.