David F. Brinker

415 total citations
21 papers, 279 citations indexed

About

David F. Brinker is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David F. Brinker has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 279 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in David F. Brinker's work include Avian ecology and behavior (19 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (5 papers). David F. Brinker is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (19 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (5 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (5 papers). David F. Brinker collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. David F. Brinker's co-authors include Bryan D. Watts, Michael D. Wilson, Thomas C. Erdman, R. Michael Erwin, Petra Bohall Wood, Sherrill Davison, Lisa Murphy, Ruth Boettcher, Barry R. Truitt and P.C. McGowan and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Wildlife Management, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Journal of Field Ornithology.

In The Last Decade

David F. Brinker

21 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David F. Brinker United States 10 229 60 51 40 30 21 279
Daniel Augusto Cardoni Argentina 11 269 1.2× 135 2.3× 43 0.8× 60 1.5× 37 1.2× 23 319
Sjoerd Duijns Netherlands 10 258 1.1× 58 1.0× 76 1.5× 86 2.1× 58 1.9× 13 310
Kenneth D. Meyer United States 9 221 1.0× 80 1.3× 77 1.5× 49 1.2× 31 1.0× 22 266
M. Clay Green United States 10 265 1.2× 54 0.9× 70 1.4× 27 0.7× 53 1.8× 29 306
Carolyn S. Mostello United States 11 268 1.2× 113 1.9× 81 1.6× 87 2.2× 33 1.1× 18 334
S. Hunter United Kingdom 6 273 1.2× 41 0.7× 68 1.3× 86 2.1× 15 0.5× 10 307
Ruth Boettcher United States 11 235 1.0× 133 2.2× 120 2.4× 26 0.7× 15 0.5× 23 286
Sarah E. Warnock United States 6 350 1.5× 84 1.4× 55 1.1× 73 1.8× 31 1.0× 6 381
Kelsi L. Hunt United States 13 326 1.4× 91 1.5× 106 2.1× 63 1.6× 42 1.4× 23 350
Laura McFarlane‐Tranquilla Canada 8 239 1.0× 47 0.8× 62 1.2× 73 1.8× 40 1.3× 12 265

Countries citing papers authored by David F. Brinker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David F. Brinker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David F. Brinker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David F. Brinker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David F. Brinker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David F. Brinker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David F. Brinker. The network helps show where David F. Brinker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David F. Brinker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David F. Brinker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David F. Brinker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David F. Brinker. David F. Brinker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Prosser, Diann J., et al.. (2023). A Comparison of Direct & Indirect Survey Methods for Estimating Colonial Nesting Waterbird Populations. Waterbirds. 45(2). 1 indexed citations
2.
Wiebe, Karen L., Jean‐François Therrien, Gilles Gauthier, et al.. (2022). Factors associated with returns of snowy owls to airports following translocation. Journal of Wildlife Management. 86(5). 5 indexed citations
3.
Sullivan, Jeffery D., et al.. (2022). An evaluation of transmitter effects on adult and juvenile Common Terns using leg-loop harness attachments. Journal of Field Ornithology. 93(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
Watts, Bryan D., et al.. (2021). Decline of Eastern Black Rails (Laterallus jamaicensis jamaicensis) within the Chesapeake Bay Region, USA. Waterbirds. 44(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
Sullivan, Jeffery D., et al.. (2020). Assessing nest attentiveness of Common Terns via video cameras and temperature loggers. Avian Research. 11(1). 4 indexed citations
6.
Rota, Christopher T., et al.. (2019). An Improved Mechanical Owl for Efficient Capture of Nesting Raptors. Journal of Raptor Research. 53(1). 14–14. 3 indexed citations
7.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (2018). A Video Surveillance System to Monitor Breeding Colonies of Common Terns (<em>Sterna Hirundo</em>). Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2 indexed citations
8.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (2011). Use of Ultraviolet Light as an Aid in Age Classification of Owls. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 123(2). 373–377. 45 indexed citations
9.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (2010). Serum Biochemistry Values, Plasma Mineral Levels, and Whole Blood Heavy Metal Measurements in Wild Northern Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine. 41(4). 649–655. 18 indexed citations
10.
Erwin, R. Michael, et al.. (2010). Islands at bay: rising seas, eroding islands, and waterbird habitat loss in Chesapeake Bay (USA). Journal of Coastal Conservation. 15(1). 51–60. 29 indexed citations
11.
Emslie, Steven D., et al.. (2009). Population Trends in Royal and Sandwich Terns Along the Mid-Atlantic Seaboard, USA, 1975–2005. Waterbirds. 32(1). 54–63. 7 indexed citations
12.
Wilson, Michael D., Bryan D. Watts, & David F. Brinker. (2007). Status Review of Chesapeake Bay Marsh Lands and Breeding Marsh Birds. Waterbirds. 30(sp1). 122–137. 34 indexed citations
13.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (2007). American Oystercatchers in Maryland and Virginia, USA: Status and Distribution. Waterbirds. 30(sp1). 152–162. 11 indexed citations
14.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (2007). The Status of Colonial Nesting Wading Bird Populations Within the Chesapeake Bay and Atlantic Barrier Island-Lagoon System. Waterbirds. 30(sp1). 82–92. 11 indexed citations
15.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (2007). Colonial-nesting Seabirds in the Chesapeake Bay Region: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Going?. Waterbirds. 30(sp1). 93–104. 25 indexed citations
16.
Wood, Petra Bohall, et al.. (2002). WINTER HOME RANGE AND HABITAT USE OF FEMALE NORTHERN SAW-WHET OWLS ON ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MARYLAND. The Wilson Bulletin. 114(3). 309–313. 7 indexed citations
17.
Wood, Petra Bohall, et al.. (2000). DIURNAL ROOST SITE CHARACTERISTICS OF NORTHERN SAW-WHET OWLS WINTERING AT ASSATEAGUE ISLAND, MARYLAND. The Wilson Bulletin. 112(3). 332–336. 9 indexed citations
18.
Erdman, Thomas C., et al.. (1998). Productivity, population trend, and status of Northern Goshawks, Accipiter gentilis atricapillus, in northeastern Wisconsin. The Canadian Field-Naturalist. 112(1). 17–27. 7 indexed citations
19.
Erdman, Thomas C. & David F. Brinker. (1997). Increasing mist net captures of migrant Northern Saw-whet Owls ( Aegolius acadicus ) with an audiolure. 190. 20 indexed citations
20.
Brinker, David F., et al.. (1997). Autumn migration of Northern Saw-whet Owls (Aegolius acadicus) in the Middle Atlantic and Northeastern United States: what observations from 1995 suggest. 190. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Augusto Cardoni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sjoerd Duijns Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kenneth D. Meyer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Clay Green Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Carolyn S. Mostello Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Hunter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ruth Boettcher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah E. Warnock Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kelsi L. Hunt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Laura McFarlane‐Tranquilla
Rankless by CCL
2026