David E. Yates

772 total citations
8 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

David E. Yates is a scholar working on Ecology, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, David E. Yates has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in David E. Yates's work include Marine animal studies overview (6 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers). David E. Yates is often cited by papers focused on Marine animal studies overview (6 papers), Mercury impact and mitigation studies (6 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (3 papers). David E. Yates collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. David E. Yates's co-authors include David C. Evers, Kenneth Munney, Andrew Major, Robert J. Taylor, John H. Cooley, Christopher R. DeSorbo, William E. Hanson, Kate M. Taylor, Nina Schoch and Lucas Savoy and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Indicators, Ecotoxicology and Waterbirds.

In The Last Decade

David E. Yates

8 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David E. Yates United States	8	500	404	118	68	45	8	624
John Schmerfeld United States	9	334 0.7×	313 0.8×	95 0.8×	64 0.9×	59 1.3×	10	447
Anne M. Condon United States	8	633 1.3×	454 1.1×	38 0.3×	131 1.9×	98 2.2×	10	731
James L. Kaiser United States	13	324 0.6×	235 0.6×	28 0.2×	100 1.5×	70 1.6×	19	515
Kurt K. Burnham United States	10	250 0.5×	270 0.7×	66 0.6×	120 1.8×	33 0.7×	22	528
Maureen I. A. Woodburn United Kingdom	12	341 0.7×	434 1.1×	36 0.3×	111 1.6×	87 1.9×	18	647
William A. Burnham United States	9	164 0.3×	270 0.7×	55 0.5×	57 0.8×	31 0.7×	18	416
Oksana P. Lane United States	11	355 0.7×	295 0.7×	15 0.1×	51 0.8×	39 0.9×	21	434
Marcelo Romano Argentina	12	84 0.2×	208 0.5×	70 0.6×	54 0.8×	68 1.5×	26	363
Jennifer A. Gervais United States	11	125 0.3×	248 0.6×	79 0.7×	48 0.7×	102 2.3×	20	411
Peter Aastrup Denmark	14	151 0.3×	201 0.5×	73 0.6×	71 1.0×	43 1.0×	23	446

Countries citing papers authored by David E. Yates

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Yates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Yates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Yates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Yates

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Yates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Yates. The network helps show where David E. Yates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David E. Yates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David E. Yates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David E. Yates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David E. Yates. David E. Yates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Johnson, Chris J., et al.. (2018). Wildlife health indicators and mercury exposure: A case study of river otters (Lontra canadensis) in central British Columbia, Canada. Ecological Indicators. 89. 63–73. 25 indexed citations

Karouna‐Renier, Natalie K., Carl W. White, Chris Perkins, John Schmerfeld, & David E. Yates. (2014). Assessment of mitochondrial DNA damage in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) collected near a mercury-contaminated river. Ecotoxicology. 23(8). 1419–1429. 29 indexed citations

Paruk, James D., Christopher R. DeSorbo, Lucas Savoy, et al.. (2014). Body Mass in Common Loons (Gavia immer) Strongly Associated with Migration Distance. Waterbirds. 37(sp1). 64–75. 12 indexed citations

Yates, David E., Evan M. Adams, David C. Evers, et al.. (2013). Mercury in bats from the northeastern United States. Ecotoxicology. 23(1). 45–55. 53 indexed citations

Nam, Dong‐Ha, et al.. (2012). Elevated mercury exposure and neurochemical alterations in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus) from a site with historical mercury contamination. Ecotoxicology. 21(4). 1094–1101. 55 indexed citations

Wada, Haruka, David E. Yates, David C. Evers, Robert J. Taylor, & William A. Hopkins. (2010). Tissue mercury concentrations and adrenocortical responses of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) near a contaminated river. Ecotoxicology. 19(7). 1277–1284. 62 indexed citations

Evers, David C., Lucas Savoy, Christopher R. DeSorbo, et al.. (2007). Adverse effects from environmental mercury loads on breeding common loons. Ecotoxicology. 17(2). 69–81. 325 indexed citations

Yates, David E., David T. Mayack, Kenneth Munney, et al.. (2005). Mercury Levels in Mink (Mustela vison) and River Otter (Lontra canadensis) from Northeastern North America. Ecotoxicology. 14(1-2). 263–274. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact