Countries citing papers authored by David E. Kretschmann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Kretschmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Kretschmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Kretschmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Kretschmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Kretschmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Kretschmann. The network helps show where David E. Kretschmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David E. Kretschmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David E. Kretschmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David E. Kretschmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David E. Kretschmann. David E. Kretschmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Morrow, Carl, et al.. (2013). PREDICTION OF WOOD QUALITY IN SMALL-DIAMETER DOUGLAS-FIR USING SITE AND STAND CHARACTERISTICS. Wood and Fiber Science. 45(1). 49–61.4 indexed citations
Faller, Ronald K., et al.. (2009). Midwest Guardrail System with round Timber Posts. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2120(1). 47–59.15 indexed citations
7.
Green, David W. & David E. Kretschmann. (2007). Lumber Property Relationships for Engineering Design Standards. Wood and Fiber Science. 23(3). 436–456.7 indexed citations
8.
Pearson, Richard G., et al.. (2007). Effect of press-drying on static bending properties of plantation-grown No. 2 loblolly pine lumber. Forest Products Journal. 57(11). 70–73.3 indexed citations
9.
Green, David W., et al.. (2007). On Fracture-Related Causes for Reduction in Tensile Strength of Southern Pine Lumber at Low Moisture Content. Wood and Fiber Science. 35(1). 90–101.1 indexed citations
Balatinecz, John J., et al.. (2001). Achievements in the utilization of poplarwood : guideposts for the future.1 indexed citations
13.
Kretschmann, David E. & David W. Green. (1999). Lumber stress grades and design properties. 113.6 indexed citations
14.
Kretschmann, David E. & David W. Green. (1996). Modeling Moisture Content-Mechanical Property Relationships For Clear Southern Pine. Wood and Fiber Science. 28(3). 320–337.75 indexed citations
Kretschmann, David E., et al.. (1994). Moisture content and the properties of clear southern pine.19 indexed citations
17.
Kretschmann, David E., et al.. (1994). Moisture content and the properties of clear southern pine. Forest Service research paper. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).2 indexed citations
18.
Kretschmann, David E. & B. A. Bendtsen. (1992). Ultimate Tensile Stress and Modulus of Elasticity of Fast-Grown Plantation Loblolly Pine Lumber. Wood and Fiber Science. 24(2). 189–203.48 indexed citations
19.
Kretschmann, David E.. (1991). Feasibility study of a modified ASTM D 143 block shear specimen for thin material. Forest Products Journal. 41(3). 37–39.1 indexed citations
20.
Kretschmann, David E., et al.. (1990). Stress class systems. An idea whose time has come.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.