Olav Høibø

1.0k total citations
42 papers, 858 citations indexed

About

Olav Høibø is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Mechanical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Olav Høibø has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 858 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Building and Construction, 27 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 16 papers in Mechanical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Olav Høibø's work include Forest ecology and management (27 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (26 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (15 papers). Olav Høibø is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (27 papers), Wood Treatment and Properties (26 papers) and Tree Root and Stability Studies (15 papers). Olav Høibø collaborates with scholars based in Norway, United States and India. Olav Høibø's co-authors include Juha Nurmi, Raída Jirjis, Lone Ross Gobakken, Anders Q. Nyrud, Erlend Nybakk, Eric Hansen, Janka Dibdiaková, Erik Larnøy, Stig Lande and Geir Skjevrak and has published in prestigious journals such as Building and Environment, Biomass and Bioenergy and Fuel Processing Technology.

In The Last Decade

Olav Høibø

42 papers receiving 803 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Olav Høibø Norway 18 368 227 204 201 181 42 858
Angela Lo Monaco Italy 19 260 0.7× 186 0.8× 79 0.4× 114 0.6× 274 1.5× 72 956
Jim L. Bowyer United States 9 441 1.2× 181 0.8× 111 0.5× 198 1.0× 139 0.8× 27 927
Rubin Shmulsky United States 15 744 2.0× 372 1.6× 385 1.9× 464 2.3× 182 1.0× 121 1.7k
Marc Stevens Belgium 18 617 1.7× 114 0.5× 221 1.1× 153 0.8× 74 0.4× 46 1.1k
Lihai Wang China 16 339 0.9× 186 0.8× 126 0.6× 261 1.3× 130 0.7× 98 1.1k
Vasiliki Kamperidou Greece 16 280 0.8× 51 0.2× 228 1.1× 94 0.5× 74 0.4× 57 665
Isabelle Duchesne Canada 18 223 0.6× 378 1.7× 188 0.9× 176 0.9× 139 0.8× 43 957
Gero Becker Germany 21 125 0.3× 226 1.0× 224 1.1× 161 0.8× 313 1.7× 43 977
P. David Jones United States 12 436 1.2× 190 0.8× 117 0.6× 122 0.6× 62 0.3× 17 777
Janka Dibdiaková Norway 13 199 0.5× 52 0.2× 218 1.1× 51 0.3× 116 0.6× 28 597

Countries citing papers authored by Olav Høibø

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Olav Høibø's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olav Høibø with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olav Høibø more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Olav Høibø

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olav Høibø. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olav Høibø. The network helps show where Olav Høibø may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olav Høibø

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olav Høibø. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olav Høibø based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olav Høibø. Olav Høibø is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2018). Predicting dynamic modulus of elasticity of Norway spruce structural timber by forest inventory, airborne laser scanning and harvester-derived data. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 33(6). 603–612. 6 indexed citations
2.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2018). Preferences for Urban Building Materials: Does Building Culture Background Matter? †. Forests. 9(8). 504–504. 17 indexed citations
3.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2018). Surface mould growth on wooden claddings – effects of transient wetting, relative humidity, temperature and material properties. Wood Material Science and Engineering. 14(3). 129–141. 19 indexed citations
4.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2016). Estimating the density of coast Douglas-fir wood samples at different moisture contents using medical X-ray computed tomography. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 127. 50–55. 21 indexed citations
5.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2016). Modelling the variability of density and bending properties of Norway spruce structural timber. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 46(7). 978–985. 11 indexed citations
6.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2015). Pre-sorting of Norway spruce structural timber using acoustic measurements combined with site-, tree- and log characteristics. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 73(6). 819–828. 17 indexed citations
7.
Høibø, Olav, Eric Hansen, & Erlend Nybakk. (2015). Building material preferences with a focus on wood in urban housing: durability and environmental impacts. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 45(11). 1617–1627. 63 indexed citations
8.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2014). Variation in treatability of Scots pine sapwood: a survey of 25 different northern European locations. Wood Science and Technology. 48(5). 1049–1068. 18 indexed citations
9.
Steffenrem, Arne, et al.. (2014). A high-throughput X-ray-based method for measurements of relative wood density from unprepared increment cores fromPicea abies. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 29(5). 506–514. 15 indexed citations
10.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2013). Bending properties and strength grading of Norway spruce: variation within and between stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 44(2). 128–135. 16 indexed citations
11.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2011). Modelling moisture content and dry matter loss during storage of logging residues for energy. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 26(3). 267–277. 54 indexed citations
12.
Gobakken, Lone Ross, et al.. (2010). Factors influencing surface mould growth on wooden claddings exposed outdoors. Wood Material Science and Engineering. 5(1). 1–12. 18 indexed citations
13.
Høibø, Olav & Anders Q. Nyrud. (2010). Consumer perception of wood surfaces: the relationship between stated preferences and visual homogeneity. Journal of Wood Science. 56(4). 276–283. 56 indexed citations
14.
Gobakken, Lone Ross, et al.. (2010). Mould growth on paints with different surface structures when applied on wooden claddings exposed outdoors. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 64(5). 339–345. 29 indexed citations
15.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2009). Grade yield of lumber in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) as affected by forest quality, tree size, and log length.. Forest Products Journal. 59(6). 70–78. 6 indexed citations
17.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2004). Fysiske og mekaniske egenskaper til rundtømmer og firkant av furu fra høyereliggende skog. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 1 indexed citations
18.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (2000). Crack formation in unfinished siding of aspen ( Populus tremula L.) and Norway spruce ( Picea abies (L.) Karst.) during accelerated weathering. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 58(3). 135–139. 12 indexed citations
19.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (1998). Simulated yield in a sawmill using different measurement technologies. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 56(4). 267–274. 8 indexed citations
20.
Høibø, Olav, et al.. (1998). Cross-sectional shape models of Scots pine (Pinus silvestris) and Norway Spruce (Picea abies). European Journal of Wood and Wood Products. 56(3). 187–191. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026