David Cummiskey
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
-
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Papers in
-
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 6
- War, Ethics, and Justification 2
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 1
-
- Free Will and Agency 5
- Co-authors
- Anita L. AllenDavid DeGraziaVirginia HeldDavid GallagherBeth J. SingerMichael SloteJiyeon KangJeffrey Reiman
- Journals
- Analysis (2 papers)The Philosophical Review (2 papers)The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)Metaphilosophy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Cummiskey
14 papers receiving 130 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Philosophy 94
- Cognitive Neuroscience 69
- Political Science and International Relations 57
- History and Philosophy of Science 10
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 9
Countries citing papers authored by David Cummiskey
This map shows the geographic impact of David Cummiskey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Cummiskey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Cummiskey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Cummiskey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Cummiskey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Cummiskey. The network helps show where David Cummiskey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside David Cummiskey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 3 | Dependent Origination, Emptiness, and the Value of Nature | 2017 | 2 |
| 4 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 6 | Declaring Death, Giving Life | 2005 | 1 |
| 7 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 8 | Gewirth: Critical Essays on Action, Rationality, and Community | 1998 | 10 |
| 9 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 63 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 30 | |
| 13 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 8 |
About David Cummiskey
David Cummiskey is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Rehabilitation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 141 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Free Will and Agency (5 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (1 paper), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (1 paper), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (1 paper) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (94 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (69 citations), Political Science and International Relations (57 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (9 citations). David Cummiskey has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anita L. Allen, David DeGrazia, Virginia Held, David Gallagher, Beth J. Singer, Michael Slote, Jiyeon Kang, Jeffrey Reiman, Edward Spence and Deryck Beyleveld. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The Philosophical Review, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Philosophical Studies and Metaphilosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.