Jean‐Paul Décamps
- Finance top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Accounting top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas MariottiStéphane VilleneuveJean‐Charles RochetPierre‐François KoehlSebastian GryglewiczErwan MorellecStefano LovoChristophe Bisière
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (10 papers)Economic theories and models (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceSwitzerlandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jean‐Paul Décamps
27 papers receiving 596 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Finance 505
- Economics and Econometrics 326
- Accounting 208
- Management Science and Operations Research 102
- Strategy and Management 68
Countries citing papers authored by Jean‐Paul Décamps
This map shows the geographic impact of Jean‐Paul Décamps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jean‐Paul Décamps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jean‐Paul Décamps more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jean‐Paul Décamps
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jean‐Paul Décamps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jean‐Paul Décamps. The network helps show where Jean‐Paul Décamps may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jean‐Paul Décamps
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jean‐Paul Décamps. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jean‐Paul Décamps based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jean‐Paul Décamps. Jean‐Paul Décamps is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 49 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 110 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 119 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | A Structural Econometric Investigation of the Agency Theory of Financial Structure | 2 |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Jean‐Paul Décamps
Jean‐Paul Décamps is a scholar working on Finance, Accounting and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (11 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (10 papers) and Economic theories and models (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (505 citations), Accounting (208 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (326 citations). Jean‐Paul Décamps has collaborated with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Mariotti, Stéphane Villeneuve, Jean‐Charles Rochet, Pierre‐François Koehl, Sebastian Gryglewicz, Erwan Morellec, Stefano Lovo, Christophe Bisière, Bruno Biais and Ali Lazrak. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Finance, Review of Financial Studies and Journal of Banking & Finance.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.