David Boonin
Impact in
- Philosophy top 1%
- War, Ethics, and Justification
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Papers in
-
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 2
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 2
-
- War, Ethics, and Justification 3
David Boonin
19 papers receiving 415 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Philosophy 201
- Cognitive Neuroscience 207
- Political Science and International Relations 138
- Sociology and Political Science 176
- Reproductive Medicine 34
Countries citing papers authored by David Boonin
This map shows the geographic impact of David Boonin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Boonin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Boonin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Boonin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Boonin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Boonin. The network helps show where David Boonin may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside David Boonin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 102 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 76 | |
| 3 | The problem of punishment | 2008 | 75 |
| 4 | 2002 | 58 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 48 | |
| 6 | How to solve the non-identity problem | 2008 | 28 |
| 7 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 11 | Dead Wrong: The Ethics of Posthumous Harm | 2019 | 7 |
| 12 | 2012 | 7 | |
| 13 | What's Wrong?: Applied Ethicists and Their Critics | 2009 | 7 |
| 14 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 1 |
About David Boonin
David Boonin is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 22 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include War, Ethics, and Justification (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (2 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (201 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations), Political Science and International Relations (138 citations), Sociology and Political Science (176 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (34 citations). David Boonin has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tom Sorell and Graham Oddie. Their work appears in journals such as The Electricity Journal, Journal of Social Philosophy, The Philosophical Review, Journal of Applied Philosophy and South African Journal of Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.