David Bholat

637 citations
35 papers · 344 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

David Bholat

33 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers

David Bholat
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Finance 149
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 75
  • Accounting 91
  • Management Information Systems 56
  • Economics and Econometrics 146
Replace Matthias Uhl with:
Matthias Uhl Switzerland
Antônio Carlos Figueiredo Pinto Brazil
Cathy Yi‐Hsuan Chen Germany
Mark C. Hutchinson Ireland
Madhumita Chakraborty India
John Kiff United States
Luca Casolaro Italy
Mathias Lé France
Salil K. Sarkar United States
Henry Leung Australia
David Bholat relative to Matthias Uhl Switzerland Matthias Uhl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Matthias Uhl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Bholat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Bholat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bholat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bholat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Bholat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bholat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bholat. The network helps show where David Bholat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside David Bholat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Bholat Line = papers co-authored together David Bholat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201576
2 201961
3 201528
4 201725
5
Text mining for central banks: handbook
201516
6 201616
7 201615
8 202114
9 201614
10 201612
11 20217
12 20137
13 20177
14 20166
15 20136
16 20185
17 20124
18 20124
19 20204
20 20222

About David Bholat

David Bholat is a scholar working on Finance, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Management Information Systems, having authored 35 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Banking stability, regulation, efficiency (15 papers), Economic, financial, and policy analysis (8 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (6 papers), FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (5 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (4 papers), Global Financial Regulation and Crises (4 papers), Insurance and Financial Risk Management (3 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Finance (149 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (75 citations), Accounting (91 citations), Management Information Systems (56 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (146 citations). David Bholat has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Hansen, Cheryl Schonhardt-Bailey, Ulrich Atz, Rosa M. Lastra, Sheri M. Markose, Daniel Susskind, Alex Gillespie, Tom W. Reader, M. Anson and Ryland Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Ideologies, The Economic Journal, Financial History Review, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities and Oxford Review of Economic Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact