David Beresford
- Insect Science top 2%
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Co-authors
- J. F. SUTCLIFFEChristopher J. KylePaul R. MartinLynda E. KimpeKurt KyserJoseph J. NoceraJohn P. SmolMatthew W. Reudink
- Topics
- Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (21 papers)Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (16 papers)Insect behavior and control techniques (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Science of The Total EnvironmentProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
David Beresford
57 papers receiving 467 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Insect Science 278
- Ecology 207
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 153
- Genetics 78
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 64
Countries citing papers authored by David Beresford
This map shows the geographic impact of David Beresford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Beresford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Beresford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Beresford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Beresford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Beresford. The network helps show where David Beresford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Beresford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Beresford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Beresford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Beresford. David Beresford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | The use of mulch to increase Spider (Arachnidae) numbers; a habitat approach to biological insect control | 1 |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About David Beresford
David Beresford is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 62 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies (21 papers), Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (16 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (278 citations), Ecological Modeling (50 citations) and Ecology (207 citations). David Beresford has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. F. SUTCLIFFE, Christopher J. Kyle, Paul R. Martin, Lynda E. Kimpe, Kurt Kyser, Joseph J. Nocera, John P. Smol, Matthew W. Reudink, Neal Michelutti and Christopher Grooms. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.