David Bain
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Philosophy top 5%
- Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 6
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 6
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 3
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 1
- Co-authors
- Michael S. Brady (1 shared paper)Dennis Jackson (1 shared paper)Ralf Sasse (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Australasian Journal of Philosophy (2 papers)Philosophical Papers (1 paper)The Southern Journal of Philosophy (1 paper)Philosophical Studies (1 paper)The Philosophical Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
David Bain
10 papers receiving 217 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Cognitive Neuroscience 182
- Philosophy 81
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- Sensory Systems 23
- Social Psychology 93
Countries citing papers authored by David Bain
This map shows the geographic impact of David Bain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Bain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Bain more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Bain
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Bain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Bain. The network helps show where David Bain may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside David Bain, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 6 | The Imperative View of Pain | 2011 | 15 |
| 7 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 0 |
About David Bain
David Bain is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (2 papers), Advanced Authentication Protocols Security (1 paper) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (182 citations), Philosophy (81 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), Sensory Systems (23 citations) and Social Psychology (93 citations). David Bain has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Brady, Dennis Jackson and Ralf Sasse. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Papers, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.