David Ames

822 total citations
10 papers, 597 citations indexed

About

David Ames is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, David Ames has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 597 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in David Ames's work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers). David Ames is often cited by papers focused on Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (2 papers). David Ames collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. David Ames's co-authors include John T. O’Brien, Isaac Schweitzer, Susy Harrigan, Patricia Desmond, Colin L. Masters, Ralph N. Martins, Olivier Salvado, Samantha C. Burnham, Christopher C. Rowe and Greg Savage and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet Neurology, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

In The Last Decade

David Ames

10 papers receiving 581 citations

Peers

David Ames

PMH

PHYSI

CN

NEURO

PHEOH

Heather S. Anderson United States

Jason J. Hassenstab United States

Felipe Kenji Sudo Brazil

Octavio Rodríguez‐Gómez Spain

Diler Acar United States

Valentina A. Tesky Germany

K. H. Tragl Austria

Ana Espinosa Spain

Marta Zaffira Conti Italy

Barbara Vicini Chilovi Italy

Heather S. Anderson United States

David Ames

278 ×0.9

PMH

315 ×1.3

PHYSI

134 ×0.8

CN

68 ×0.7

NEURO

78 ×0.8

PHEOH

Citations per year, relative to David Ames David Ames (= 1×) peers Heather S. Anderson

Countries citing papers authored by David Ames

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Ames

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ames. The network helps show where David Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Ames

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Ames. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Ames based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Ames. David Ames is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Lim, Yen Ying, Jenalle E. Baker, Christopher Fowler, et al.. (2020). Deficits in learning are greater than memory dysfunction in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 16. 1 indexed citations

2.

Ong, Ben, Kerryn E. Pike, Elizabeth Mullaly, et al.. (2016). The Contribution of Prospective Memory Performance to the Neuropsychological Assessment of Mild Cognitive Impairment. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 30(1). 131–149. 17 indexed citations

3.

Burnham, Samantha C., Pierrick Bourgeat, Vincent Doré, et al.. (2016). Clinical and cognitive trajectories in cognitively healthy elderly individuals with suspected non-Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology (SNAP) or Alzheimer's disease pathology: a longitudinal study. The Lancet Neurology. 15(10). 1044–1053. 150 indexed citations

4.

Kinsella, Glynda, David Ames, Elsdon Storey, et al.. (2015). Strategies for Improving Memory: A Randomized Trial of Memory Groups for Older People, Including those with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 49(1). 31–43. 48 indexed citations

5.

Loi, Samantha M., et al.. (2015). Minimising psychotropic use for behavioural disturbance in residential aged care.. PubMed. 44(4). 180–4. 7 indexed citations

6.

Lim, Yen Ying, Victor L. Villemagne, Simon M. Laws, et al.. (2014). O3‐07‐01: AMYLOID β‐RELATED COGNITIVE DECLINE IN PRECLINICAL ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE IS MODERATED BY APOE AND BDNF POLYMORPHISMS. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 10(4S_Part_3). 2 indexed citations

7.

Gardener, Samantha L., Yian Gu, Stephanie R. Rainey‐Smith, et al.. (2012). Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and Alzheimer’s disease risk in an Australian population. Translational Psychiatry. 2(10). e164–e164. 129 indexed citations

8.

Schweitzer, Isaac, Virginia Tuckwell, David Ames, & John T. O’Brien. (2001). Structural Neuroimaging Studies in Late-Life Depression: A Review. The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry. 2(2). 83–88. 41 indexed citations

9.

Shah, Anand, E. Chiu, & David Ames. (2000). Aggressive behaviour and environmental characteristics in Australian nursing homes. Aging & Mental Health. 4(1). 43–47. 5 indexed citations

10.

O’Brien, John T., et al.. (1996). A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of White Matter Lesions in Depression and Alzheimer's Disease. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 168(4). 477–485. 197 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact