David Akers
Impact in
-
- Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Interactive and Immersive Displays
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
-
- Usability and User Interface Design 3
- Interactive and Immersive Displays 2
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 2
- Co-authors
- Brian A. Wandell (2 shared papers)Anthony J. Sherbondy (2 shared papers)Robert F. Dougherty (2 shared papers)Robin Jeffries (2 shared papers)Terry Winograd (2 shared papers)Frank Losasso (1 shared paper)Maneesh Agrawala (1 shared paper)Pat Hanrahan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control (1 paper)IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
David Akers
8 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 63
- Human-Computer Interaction 54
- Computational Mathematics 5
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 115
- Cognitive Neuroscience 82
Countries citing papers authored by David Akers
This map shows the geographic impact of David Akers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Akers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Akers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Akers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Akers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Akers. The network helps show where David Akers may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside David Akers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 88 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 57 | |
| 3 | 2005 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 41 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 3 |
About David Akers
David Akers is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Human-Computer Interaction, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Automotive Engineering and Information Systems, having authored 8 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (1 paper), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper) and Advanced Vision and Imaging (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (63 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (54 citations), Computational Mathematics (5 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (115 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (82 citations). David Akers has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian A. Wandell, Anthony J. Sherbondy, Robert F. Dougherty, Robin Jeffries, Terry Winograd, Frank Losasso, Maneesh Agrawala, Pat Hanrahan, John W. Rick and Jeff Klingner. Their work appears in journals such as ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control and IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.