Dave Coyle

658 citations
10 papers · 499 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Dave Coyle

10 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Dave Coyle
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Research and Theory 40
  • Public Administration 51
  • General Health Professions 324
  • Clinical Psychology 201
  • Social Psychology 173
Replace Graham Sloan with:
Graham Sloan United Kingdom
Poppy Buchanan‐Barker United Kingdom
Yael Reid United Kingdom
Nadine Nehls United States
Alun Jones United Kingdom
Ellie Taylor Australia
Jeremy M. Linton United States
Tim Heffernan Australia
Barbara Harris United States
Monica Pedrazza Italy
Dave Coyle relative to Graham Sloan United Kingdom Graham Sloan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Graham Sloan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dave Coyle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dave Coyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dave Coyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dave Coyle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dave Coyle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dave Coyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dave Coyle. The network helps show where Dave Coyle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Dave Coyle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dave Coyle Line = papers co-authored together Dave Coyle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2006163
2 2005103
3 200587
4 200856
5 200837
6 200327
7 200012
8 20106
9
Mental health nurses feel the strain
20005
10 19993

About Dave Coyle

Dave Coyle is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers), Workplace Violence and Bullying (2 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers), Stress and Burnout Research (2 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (40 citations), Public Administration (51 citations), General Health Professions (324 citations), Clinical Psychology (201 citations) and Social Psychology (173 citations). Dave Coyle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Edwards, Ben Hannigan, Philip Burnard, Anne Fothergill, T. Mason, Linda Cooper, John Adams, P Burnard, Jon Adams and Lesley Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing and Health Sciences, International Social Work, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing and Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact