Daoxin Wang

2.5k citations
94 papers · 1.7k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Daoxin Wang

90 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Daoxin Wang
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Infectious Diseases 259
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 347
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 40
  • Immunology 172
  • Cancer Research 112
Replace Neil M. Goldenberg with:
Neil M. Goldenberg Canada
Zhenhua Wang China
Yiqing Liu China
Jolien Vandewalle Belgium
Shengyu Wang China
Jishou Zhang China
Hohyun Kim South Korea
Melissa M. Grant United Kingdom
Daoxin Wang relative to Neil M. Goldenberg Canada Neil M. Goldenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Neil M. Goldenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daoxin Wang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daoxin Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daoxin Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daoxin Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daoxin Wang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daoxin Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daoxin Wang. The network helps show where Daoxin Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daoxin Wang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daoxin Wang Line = papers co-authored together Daoxin Wang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020141
2 202084
3 202075
4 201673
5 202068
6 201265
7 202159
8 201457
9 201855
10 202055
11 202252
12 202149
13 201743
14 201840
15 201236
16 201335
17 201232
18 201332
19 201931
20 200329

About Daoxin Wang

Daoxin Wang is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (15 papers), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (12 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (10 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (3 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (259 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (347 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (40 citations), Immunology (172 citations) and Cancer Research (112 citations). Daoxin Wang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Di Qi, Wang Deng, Jing He, Xinyu Deng, Xumao Tang, Changyi Li, Longhua Feng, Wen Li, Qian Yu and Yan Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Respiratory Research, Frontiers in Medicine, Shock, International Journal of COPD and Clinical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact