Dany Savard
- Geophysics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 2%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Sarah‐Jane BarnesL. Paul BédardThomas MeiselCarl GuilmetteDerya GürerMatthijs A. SmitDouwe J.J. van HinsbergenMarco Maffione
- Topics
- Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (27 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (25 papers)Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Dany Savard
35 papers receiving 904 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Geophysics 733
- Artificial Intelligence 495
- Geochemistry and Petrology 208
- Analytical Chemistry 82
- Inorganic Chemistry 61
Countries citing papers authored by Dany Savard
This map shows the geographic impact of Dany Savard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dany Savard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dany Savard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dany Savard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dany Savard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dany Savard. The network helps show where Dany Savard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dany Savard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dany Savard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dany Savard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dany Savard. Dany Savard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | Forced subduction initiation recorded in the sole and crust of the Semail Ophiolite of Omanbreakdown → | 192 |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | Accurate LA-ICP-MS calibration for magnetite analysis using multiple reference materials | 6 |
| 19 | Sulfide and oxide reference materials for LA-ICP-MS | 1 |
| 20 | 31 |
About Dany Savard
Dany Savard is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 35 papers that have together received 927 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (27 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (25 papers) and Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (733 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (208 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (495 citations). Dany Savard has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sarah‐Jane Barnes, L. Paul Bédard, Thomas Meisel, Carl Guilmette, Derya Gürer, Matthijs A. Smit, Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen, Marco Maffione, Fernando Corfú and Wolfgang D. Maier. Their work appears in journals such as Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Nature Geoscience and Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.